Preview

Moscow Surgical Journal

Advanced search

Comparative analysis of modern methods for diagnosing microcholedocholithiasis

https://doi.org/10.17238/2072-3180-2022-2-51-57

Abstract

Introduction. To date, there are many methods for diagnosing choledocholithiasis, but the problem of identifying small stones of the common bile duct remains relevant.

Materials and methods. The work is based on the results of a survey of 65 patients with suspected microcholedocholithiasis, who are being treated at the GKB named after. S.P. Botkin in the period 2020–2022. To analyze the results, all patients were divided into two groups. The first group included 38 (70 %) patients with cholelithiasis, in patients according to the biochemical blood test and transabdominal ultrasound, there were signs of hepaticocholedochus expansion, but the presence of calculi is doubtful. The second group included 16 (30 %) patients with clinical manifestations of cholelithiasis, but there was no pathology according to the results of a biochemical blood test and transabdominal ultrasound.

Results. In the first group of patients, according to MRCP data, in 8 (21 %) cases, filling defects with a diameter of 3–4 mm were found, and in 30 (79 %) cases, calculi were not suspected.

In the second group of patients in 3 out of 18 (17 %) patients, according to the results of MRCP, filling defects with a diameter of up to 4 mm were detected, in 8 (44 %), according to the results of EUS, calculi were detected in the lumen of the choledochus, and in the remaining 7 (9 %) patients, calculi were not identified by either MRCP or EUS.

Conclusion. In most cases, EUS plays an important key role in the diagnosis of microcholedocholithiasis in patients with cholelithiasis, which improves the results of treatment in this category of patients.

About the Authors

A. V. Shabunin
GBUZ City Clinical Hospital. S.P. Botkin; FGBOU DPO "Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education" of the Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

Shabunin Aleksey Vasilievich – Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Doctor of Medicine Sciences, Professor, Head of the surgery department RMACPS; clinic chief

125284, Moscow, 2-nd Botkinsky pr., 5



Z. A. Bagateliya
GBUZ City Clinical Hospital. S.P. Botkin; FGBOU DPO "Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education" of the Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

Bagateliya Zurab Antonovich – Doctor of Medical Sciences. Docent of the Department of surgery; Deputy chief physician (medical department)

125284, Moscow, 2-nd Botkinsky pr., 5



V. V. Bedin
GBUZ City Clinical Hospital. S.P. Botkin; FGBOU DPO "Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education" of the Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

Bedin Vladimir Vladimirovich – Doctor of Medical Sciences, associate professor surgery department RMACPS, Chief of Surgical Department

125284, Moscow, 2-nd Botkinsky pr., 5



I. Yu. Korzheva
GBUZ City Clinical Hospital. S.P. Botkin; FGBOU DPO "Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education" of the Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

Korzheva Irina Yurievna – Doctor of medical Sciences. Head of the Department of endoscopy; Head of endoscopy department 

125284, Moscow, 2-nd Botkinsky pr., 5



M. M. Tavobilov
GBUZ City Clinical Hospital. S.P. Botkin; FGBOU DPO "Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education" of the Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

Tavobilov Michail Michailovich – Doctor of Medical Sciences, associate professor surgery department RMACPS; head of the department of liver and pancreas surgery

125284, Moscow, 2-nd Botkinsky pr., 5



D. D. Dolidze
GBUZ City Clinical Hospital. S.P. Botkin; FGBOU DPO "Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education" of the Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

Dolidze David Dzhonovich – Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor of the Department of Surgery; Head of the Scientific and Clinical Department 

125284, Moscow, 2-nd Botkinsky pr., 5



M. Z. Amirov
GBUZ City Clinical Hospital. S.P. Botkin; FGBOU DPO "Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education" of the Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

Amirov Magomed Zakharovich – Postgraduate student of the Department of Endoscopy; Endoscopist of the Endos- copy Department 

125284, Moscow, 2-nd Botkinsky pr., 5



References

1. Kudelkina N.A., Eliseenko A.V. Cholelithiasis and dysfunctional disorders of the biliary tract in railway workers of Western Siberia (clinical and epidemiological study). Eurasian Union of Scientists., 2016, № 1–4 (22), pp. 64–70. (In Russ.)

2. Skvortsov V.V., Khalilova U.A. Diagnosis and treatment of gallstone disease. Experimental and clinical gastroenterology, 2018, № 9 (157), pp. 142–150. (In Russ.)

3. Tazuma S., Unno M., Igarashi Y., Inui K., Uchiyama K., Kai M., Tsuyuguchi T., Maguchi H., Mori T., Yamaguchi K., Ryozawa S., Nimura Y., Fujita N., Kubota K., Shoda J., Tabata M., Mine T., Sugano K., Watanabe M., Shimosegawa T. Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for cholelithia- sis 2016. Gastroenterol., 2017 Mar; pp. 276–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-016-1289-7

4. Natroshvili A. G., Shulutko A. M., Baychorov E. H., Natroshvili I. G., Davlyatov M. R., Osmanov E. G., Chanturiya M. O. Preoperative diagnosis of common bile duct stones: possibilities and opportunities. Medical News of North Caucasus, 2021, № 16 (1), рр. 1–5. https://doi.org/10.14300/mnnc.2021.16001 (in Russ.)

5. Shapovalyants S. G., Ukaev A. Yu., Ivanova T. V. Polarization microscopy of bile in the diagnosis of microcholedocholithiasis. Surgery, 1999, № 5, pp. 15–20. (In Russ.)

6. Nesterenko Yu.A., Laptev V.V., Tskaev A.Yu., Khokonov M.A., Burova V.A., Tronin R.Yu., Givirovskaya N.E., Ovchinnikov S.V., Mortazavi M.K. Topical issues of diagnosis and treatment of patients with microcholedocholithiasis. Annals of surgical hepatology, 2007, № 2, pp. 62–68. (In Russ.)

7. Vakulin G. V., Kondratiev A. V. Possibilities of diagnosis and correction of various types of obstruction of the terminal part of the common bile duct. Materials of the scientific-practical conference of doctors dedicated to the 100th anniversary of the surgical service of the Tver region. Tver, 2002, pp. 55–57. (In Russ.)

8. Xi Ran, Baobing Yin, Baojin Ma, “Four Major Factors Contributing to Intrahepatic Stones”, Gastroenterology Research and Practice, 2017, vol. 2017, Article ID 7213043, 5 p. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/7213043

9. Nesterenko Yu.A., Laptev V.V., Tskaev A.Yu., Khokonov M.A., Burova V.A., Tronin R.Yu., Givirovskaya N.E., Ovchinnikov S.V., Mortazavi M.K., Topical issues of diagnosis and treatment of patients with microcholedocholithiasis. Annals of Surgical Hepatology, 2007, Volume 12, № 2, pp. 62–68. (In Russ.)

10. Gurusamy K.S., Giljaca V., Takwoingi Y., Higgie D., Poropat G., Štimac D., Davidson B.R. Ultrasound versus liver function tests for diagnosis of common bile duct stones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev., Feb 26, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858

11. Bordin D.S. Recommendations of the scientific society of gastroenterologists of Russia for the diagnosis and treatment of cholelithiasis. Experimental and clinical gastroenterology, 2012, № 4, pp. 114–123. (In Russ.)

12. Zahur Z, Jeilani A, Fatima T, Ahmad A. Transabdominal Ultrasound: A Potentially Accurate and Useful Tool for Detection of Choledocholithiasis. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad, 2019, Oct–Dec; № 31(4), pp. 572–575.

13. Şurlin V., Săftoiu A., Dumitrescu D. Imaging tests for accurate di- agnosis of acute biliary pancreatitis. World J Gastroenterol., 2014, Nov 28; № 20(44). https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i44.16544

14. Polistina F.A., Frego M., Bisello M., Manzi E., Vardanega A., Perin B. Accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiography compared to operative endoscopy in detecting biliary stones, a single center experience and review of literature. World J Radiol., 2015, Apr 28; № 7(4), рр. 70–78. https://doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v7.i4.70

15. Nechipay A.M., Orlov S.Yu., Fedorov E.D. EUSbook: A guide to endoscopic ultrasonography. M. : Practical medicine, 2013, 40 р. (In Russ.)

16. Sanders D.J., Bomman S., Krishnamoorthi R., Kozarek R.A. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: Current practice and future research. World J Gastrointest Endosc., 2021, Aug 16, № 13(8), pp. 260–274. https://doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v13.i8.260

17. Ali F.S., DaVee T., Bernstam E., Kao L.S., Wandling M., Hussain M.R., Rashtak S., Ramireddy S., Guha S., Thosani N. Cost-effectiveness analysis of optimal diagnostic strategy for patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis with intermediate probability for choledocholithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc., 2021, Sep 6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2021.08.024

18. Giljaca V., Gurusamy K.S., Takwoingi Y., Higgie D., Poropat G., Štimac D., Davidson B.R. Endoscopic ultrasound versus magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for common bile duct stones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev., 2015, Feb 26; № 2015(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858


Review

For citations:


Shabunin A.V., Bagateliya Z.A., Bedin V.V., Korzheva I.Yu., Tavobilov M.M., Dolidze D.D., Amirov M.Z. Comparative analysis of modern methods for diagnosing microcholedocholithiasis. Moscow Surgical Journal. 2022;(2):51-57. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17238/2072-3180-2022-2-51-57

Views: 444


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2072-3180 (Print)