Preview

Moscow Surgical Journal

Advanced search

Laparoscopic mechanical colorectal anastomosis: technical aspects of formation and their role in the prevention of insolvency

https://doi.org/10.17238/2072-3180-2023-3-47-56

Abstract

Introduction. Colon cancer occupies one of the leading positions in the structure of oncological morbidity. One of the most severe and sometimes life-threatening complications of sphincter-sparing operations is the failure of the colorectal anastomosis, which occurs in 13 to 30 % of cases, and the associated postoperative mortality reaches 6.0-39.3 %.

The aim of the study. Improved results of surgical treatment of rectal cancer due to reduced number of cases of colorectal anastamosis failure by using in clinical practice modified method of formation of laparoscopic intracorporeal mechanical colorectal anastomosis.

Material and methods. The study included 80 patients: group I - 46 (57.5 %) patients who underwent laparoscopic anterior resection of the rectum in the conventional way; Group II included 34 patients (42.5 %) who were operated on according to the developed technique for the formation of intracorporeal colorectal anastomosis.

Results. In group I, in 4 cases, radiological failure of the anastomosis was established in the presence of a preventive stoma, in 3 patients a clinically significant failure was noted, requiring repeated intervention. Localization of suture failure in 85.7 % of cases developed in the blind pocket (“dog ears”). In group II, 2 patients with incompetence were identified, who were treated conservatively.

Conclusions. The advantage of the original method of applying colorectal anastomosis is the ability to adapt the walls of the sutured sections of the intestine even with repeated stitching of the intestinal stump with a linear apparatus.

About the Authors

A. V. Dmitriev
The Rostov State Medical University
Russian Federation

Andrej V. Dmitriev – PhD in Medicine, assistant of the Department of surgical diseases № 2, Rostov State Medical University.

344022, Nakhichevansky Lane 29, Rostov-on-Don



M. F. Cherkasov
The Rostov State Medical University
Russian Federation

Mikhail F. Cherkasov – professor, MD, DSc, head of the Department of Surgery №4, Rostov State Medical University.

344022, Nakhichevansky Lane 29, Rostov-on-Don



S. V. Pereskokov
The Rostov State Medical University
Russian Federation

Sergej V. Pereskokov – MD, DSc, associate Professor of the Department of surgical diseases № 2, Rostov State Medical University.

344022, Nakhichevansky Lane 29, Rostov-on-Don



V. S. Groshilin
The Rostov State Medical University
Russian Federation

Vitalij S. Groshilin – professor, MD, DSc, head of the Department of surgical diseases № 2, Rostov State Medical University.

344022, Nakhichevansky Lane 29, Rostov-on-Don



A. B. Alnikin
The Rostov State Medical University
Russian Federation

Aleksandr B. Alnikin – PhD in Medicine, deputy director of the clinic for clinical work, chief physician of the clinic, associate Professor of the Department of surgical diseases № 2, Rostov State Medical University.

344022, Nakhichevansky Lane 29, Rostov-on-Don



S. G. Melikova
The Rostov State Medical University
Russian Federation

Sabina G. Melikova – surgeon, Rostov State Medical University.

344022, Nakhichevansky Lane 29, Rostov-on-Don



V. K. Shvetsov
The Rostov State Medical University
Russian Federation

Vitalij K. Sнvecov – PhD in Medicine, associate Professor of the Department of surgical diseases № 2, Rostov State Medical University.

344022, Nakhichevansky Lane 29, Rostov-on-Don



E. A. Eremenko
The Rostov State Medical University
Russian Federation

Ekaterina A. Eremenko – Graduate student of the Department of surgical diseases № 2, Rostov State Medical University.

344022, Nakhichevansky Lane 29, Rostov-on-Don



E. A. Kizhevatova
The Rostov State Medical University
Russian Federation

Elena A. Kizhevatova – assistant of the Department of Medical and Biological Physics, Rostov State Medical University.

344022, Nakhichevansky Lane 29, Rostov-on-Don



References

1. Kaprin A.D., Starinskij V.V., Shahzadova A.O. Zlokachestvennye novoobrazovaniya v Rossii v 2019 godu (zabolevaemost’ i smertnost’) [Malignant neoplasms in Russia in 2019 (morbidity and mortality)]. Moscow, MNIOI im. P.A. Gercena − filial FGBU «NMIC radiologii» Minzdrava Rossii. Publ., 2020, 252 р. (In Russian)

2. Krashenkov O.P., Ivanikov I.O., Konstantinova Iu.S., Kochetkova Ya.I., Krashenkova A.P., Vinogradova N.N. Organization of oncological care for patients with colorectal cancer (narrative review). Evidence-based gastroenterology, 2021, № 10(1), рр. 17–29. (In Russian) https://doi.org/10.17116/dokgastro20211001117

3. Clinton S.K., Giovannucci E.L., Hursting S.D. The World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research third expert report on diet, nutrition, physical activity, and cancer: impact and future directions. The Journal of nutrition, 2020, № 150(4), pp. 663–671. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/nxz268

4. Siegel R.L., Miller K.D., Goding Sauer A., Fedewa S.A., Butterly L.F., Anderson J.C., Cercek A., Smith R.A., Jemal A. Colorectal cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J. Clin., 2020, № 70(3), рр. 145–164. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.216015.

5. Gaydarov S.G., Mamedli Z.Z., Lebedko M.S., Selchuk V.Yu., Tataev I.S. Colorectal anastomosis in rectal cancer surgery: methods of anastomotic leakage prevention. Pelvic surgery and oncology, 2021, № 11(2), рр. 36–43. (In Russian) https://doi.org/10.17650/2686-9594-2021-11-2-36-43

6. Lebedko M.S., Gordeev S.S., Alieva E.V., Sivolob M.D., Mamedli Z.Z., Gaydarov S.G., Kosyrev V.Yu. Risk factors for colorectal anastomotic leakage and preventive measures: a retrospective cohort study. Pelvic surgery and oncology, 2022, № 12(2), рр. 17–27. (In Russian) https://doi.org/10.17650/2686-9594-2022-12-2-17-27

7. Jia L.L., Zheng Q.Y., Tian J.H., He D.L., Zhao J.X., Zhao L.P., Huang G. Artificial intelligence with magnetic resonance imaging for prediction of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front. Oncol., 2022, № 12, рр. 1026216. https://europepmc.org/article/MED/36313696 (дата обращения 01.05.2023).

8. Song X.J., Liu Z.L., Zeng R., Ye W., Liu C.W. A meta-analysis of laparoscopic surgery versus conventional open surgery in the treatment of colorectal cancer. Medicine, 2019, № 98(17), рр. e15347. https://europepmc.org/article/MED/31027112 (дата обращения 01.05.2023).

9. Chen Z.F., Liu X., Jiang W.Z., Guan G.X. Laparoscopic double-stapled colorectal anastomosis without «dog-ears». Tech Coloproctol., 2016, № 20, рр. 243–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-016-1437-3

10. Crafa F., Megevand J., Romano G., Sileri P. New doublestapled anastomotic technique to avoid crossing staple lines. Tech Coloproctol, 2015, № 19, pp. 319–320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-015-1287-4

11. Yang Y., Ding F., Xu T., Pan Z., Zhuang J., Liu X., Guan G. Double-stapled anastomosis without «dog-ears» reduces the anastomotic leakage in laparoscopic anterior resection of rectal cancer: A prospective, randomized, controlled study. Front Surg., 2023, Jan 6; № 9, рр. 1003854. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2022.1003854/full (дата обращения 01.05.2023).

12. Tsarkov P.V., Tulina I.A., Tsugulya P.B., Kochetkov V.S., Khmelik S.V. Post-rectectomy choice of preventive intestinal stoma formation method: prospective multicenter randomized clinical trial protocol. Russian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Coloproctology, 2017, № 27(2), рр. 102–110. (In Russian) https://doi.org/10.22416/1382-4376-2017-27-2-102-110

13. Bedzhanyan A.L., Sumbaev A.A., Petrenko K.N., Frolova Yu.V., Temirsultanova Kh.R., Goncharov A.L., Andreytsev I.L. Immediate results of robot-assisted and laparoscopic interventions in sigmoid and rectal cancer surgery. Clinical and experimental surgery. Journal named after Academician B.V. Petrovsky, 2022, № 10(2), рр. 103–111. (In Russian) https://doi.org/10.33029/2308-1198-2022-10-2-103-111

14. Tsarkov P.V., Kravchenko A.Yu., Tulina I.A., Cugulya P.B. Does the formation of a hardware anastomosis during anterior resection always guarantee the restoration of intestinal continuity? Russian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Coloproctology, 2012, № 22(4), рр. 73-80. (In Russian)

15. Arnold M., Abnet C.C., Neale R.E., Vignat J., Giovannucci E.L., McGlynn K.A., Bray F. Global Burden of 5 Major Types of Gastrointestinal Cancer. Gastroenterology, 2020, 59(1), рр. 335–349. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2020.02.068


Review

For citations:


Dmitriev A.V., Cherkasov M.F., Pereskokov S.V., Groshilin V.S., Alnikin A.B., Melikova S.G., Shvetsov V.K., Eremenko E.A., Kizhevatova E.A. Laparoscopic mechanical colorectal anastomosis: technical aspects of formation and their role in the prevention of insolvency. Moscow Surgical Journal. 2023;(3):47-56. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17238/2072-3180-2023-3-47-56

Views: 491


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2072-3180 (Print)