Anterior separation plastic surgery: analysis of complications, quality of life. Te observation period is 5 years
https://doi.org/10.17238/2072-3180-2022-1-53-56
Abstract
Introduction. Nowadays, component separation is the surgery of choice for treating patients with incisional hernia.
Aim. To evaluate the results of treatment, complications and the quality of life in patients afer anterior component separation.
Material and methods. Te article presents an analysis of complications and quality of life in 96 patients with incisional hernia who underwent anterior component separation. Te characteristics of patients, polypropylene mesh, fxation method, as well as complications and quality of life are described. Te Clavien-Dindo scale was used to classify and detail complications in the frst 30 days. Te patients ' quality of life was assessed using the EuraHS Quality of Life score questionnaire.
Results. Wound complications were 11.4 %, general complications 4.2 %, hernia recurrence 1.0 %, and death 1.0 %. In most patients, 3 months afer surgery, there is a signifcant decrease in the intensity of pain, satisfaction with appearance, and an increase in physical activity.
Conclusion. Te results of the study showed a low percentage of wound complications, relapse, and a signifcant improvement in the quality of life.
About the Authors
S. A. Kuliyev
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Serdar Ataevich Kuliev – MD, Associate Professor
117198, Mikluho-Maklaya str., 21, Moscow
I. V. Evsyukova
GBUZ MO Domodedovo Central hospital
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Irina Viacheslavovna Evsyukova – MD
142005, Pirogovo str., 9, Moscow region, Domodedovo
A. V. Protasov
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Andrey Vitalievich Protasov – Professor
117198, Mikluho-Maklaya str., 21, Moscow
M. N. Fomina
Moscow State Medical and Dental University named after A. I. Evdokimov, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Milana Nikolaevna Fomina – Candidate
Delegatskaya str., 20, p. 1, Moscow, 127473
References
1. Ramirez O.M., Ruas E., Dellon A.L. “Components separation” method for closure of abdominal-wall defects: an anatomic and clinical study. Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 1990, № 86, pp. 519–526.
2. Switzer N.J., Dykstra M.A., Gill R.S., Lim S. Endoscopic versus open component separation: systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg. Endosc., 2015, № 29(4), pp. 787–795.
3. Dauser B., Ghaffari S., Ng C., Schmid T. Endoscopic anterior component separation: a novel technical approach. Hernia, 2017, № 21(6), pp. 951–955.
4. Bittner R., Bain K., LeBlanc K. et al. Guidelines for laparoscopic treatment of ventral and incisional abdominal wall hernias (International Endohernia Society (IEHS)) – Part A. Surg. Endosc., 2019, № 33(10), pp. 3069–3139.
5. Bittner R., Bain K., LeBlanc K. et al. Guidelines for laparoscopic treatment of ventral and incisional abdominal wall hernias (International Endohernia Society (IEHS)) – Part Part B. Surg. Endosc., 2019, № 33(11), pp. 3511–3549.
6. Hodgkinson J.D. A meta-analysis comparing open anterior component separation and transversus abdominis release in the repair of midline ventral hernias. Hernia, 2018, № 22(4), pp. 617–626.
7. Parent B., Horn D., Jacobson L.M. Petersen R.P. Wound morbidity in minimally invasive anterior component separation compared to transversus abdominal release. Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 2017, № 139(2), pp. 472–479.
8. Cornette B., Basquer D., Berrovoet F. Component separation technique for giant incisional hernia: a systematic review. Am. J. Surg, 2018, № 215(4), pp.719–726.
Review
For citations:
Kuliyev S.A., Evsyukova I.V., Protasov A.V., Fomina M.N. Anterior separation plastic surgery: analysis of complications, quality of life. Te observation period is 5 years. Moscow Surgical Journal. 2022;(1):53-56. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17238/2072-3180-2022-1-53-56
Views:
357
Email this article 