Modern surgical methods of hemorrhois treatment. Literature review
https://doi.org/10.17238/2072-3180-2023-4-96-103
Abstract
Introduction. The article presents the literature data on the etiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis and modern methods of surgical treatment of chronic hemorrhoids, including the use of minimally invasive methods.
Materials and methods. The development of technologies used in the surgery of hemorrhoidal disease and the desire of patients to improve the quality of life in the postoperative period, as well as the widespread use of minimally invasive technologies in outpatient treatment of proctological diseases has influenced the emergence of a large number of new and modified techniques. Minimally invasive methods are inferior in efficiency to newer methods, such as dearterization of hemorrhoids with mucoperkia and laser submucosal destruction of cavernous bodies of the lower ampullary rectum. The use of modern technologies in doppler-controlled desarterization of hemorrhoids and mucopexy, as well as laser subcutaneous submucosal destruction of hemorrhoids can significantly reduce pain and the risks of complications in the postoperative period. Various variations of laser operations for hemorrhoids, as the most modern method of treating hemorrhoidal disease, also ensure the preservation of a high level of quality of life of patients after interventions. Modern laser devices and their modifications have formed several ways of performing laser operations that are not inferior to each other in efficiency and the number of complications, however, a comparative characteristic of these methods has not been carried out.
Discussion. The problem of choosing a surgical method for the treatment of hemorrhoids is currently quite acute. There is no standardized method for each clinical stage of hemorrhoids, the choice of technique remains at the discretion of the operating surgeon-coloproctologist.
Conclusion. Due to the rapid development of minimally invasive methods of hemorrhoid treatment, the effectiveness of new methods of surgical treatment of hemorrhoids and their combinations and delayed treatment results in some variations are not inferior to classical methods of performing operations.
About the Authors
A. M. TariverdievRussian Federation
Tariverdiev Andrey Mikhailovich – postgraduate student of department of endoscopic surgery, Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education «A.I. Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry» of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russion Federation
- Moscow, Delegatskaya st. 20
O. E. Lutsevich
Russian Federation
Lutsevich Oleg Emmanuilovich – Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Honored Doctor of the Russian Federation, Laureate of the Government of the Russian Federation, Head of the Department of Faculty Surgery No. 1 of the Moscow State Medical and Dental University named after A.I. Evdokimov, Chief Surgeon of CJSC TSELT
127473, Moscow, Delegatskaya str., d.20, page 1
D. L. Davidovich
Russian Federation
Davidovich Denis Leonidovich – PhD, head of center of coloproctology in Federal Scientific and Clinical Centre of Federal Medical and Biology Agency of Russia
115682, Moscow, Orekhoviy bvd, 28
A. V. Fedorov
Russian Federation
Fedorov Andrey Vladimirovich – PhD, Professor, professor of department of endoscopic surgery, Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education «A.I. Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry» of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russion Federation
- Moscow, Delegatskaya st. 20
D. Yu. Bogdanov
Russian Federation
Bogdanov Dmitriy Yuryevich – PhD, Professor, professor of department of endoscopic surgery, Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education «A.I. Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry» of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russion Federation
- Moscow, Delegatskaya st. 20
References
1. Shelygin Ju.A. Titov A.Ju. Blagodarniy L.A. Achkasov S.I. Hemorrhoids. Diagnostics and treatment. M.: GEOTAR-Media, 2022, 216 p. (In Russ.)
2. Shelygin Ju.A. Blagodarniy L.A. Guide in coloproctology. M.: Littera, 2014, 64–89 p. (In Russ.)
3. Corman M.L. Hemorrhoids. Colon and rectal surgery. 6th ed. Philadelphia, USA: Lippincott, 2013, pp. 272–366.
4. Wald A., Bharucha A.E., Cosman B.C. et al. ACG clinical guideline: management of benign anorectal disorders. Am J Gastroenterol., 2014, № 109(8), pp. 1141–1157. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2014.190
5. Davis B.R., Lee-Kong S.A., Migaly J. et al. The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum., 2018, № 61(3), pp. 284–292. http://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000001030
6. Veselov A.V. Omelyanovskiy V.V. Moskalev A.I. et al. Features of the organization of medical care for hemorrhoids in the subjects of the Russian Federation for 2018. Coloproctology, 2020, № 3(73), pp. 126–134 (In Russ.)
7. Vorobyev G.I. Shelygin Ju.A. Blagodarniy L.A. Hemorrhoids. M. : Mitra-Press, 2002, 192 p. (In Russ.)
8. Rivkin V.L. Bronshtein A.S. Fain S.N. Guide in coloproctology. M.: Medpraktika, 2001, 300 p. (In Russ.)
9. Milito G., Cadeddu F. Tips and tricks: haemorrhoidectomy with LigaSure. Tech Coloproctol., 2009, № 13, pp. 317–320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-009-0530-2
10. Haas P.A. Fox T.A. Haas S.P. The pathogenesis of haemorrhoids. Dis-Col-Rect., 1984, pр. 442–450. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02555533
11. Shelygin Ju.A. Titov A.Ju. Abritcova M.V. Modified classification of haemorrhoids. Coloproctology, 2015, № 2(52), pр. 4–10. (In Russ.)
12. Cohee M.W., Hurff A., Gazewood J.D. Benign Anorectal Conditions: Evaluation and Management. Am Fam Physician, 2020, № 1, pp. 24 – 33
13. Lohsiriwat V. Treatment of hemorrhoids: a coloproctologist’s view. World J Gastroenterol., 2015, № 21(31), pp. 9245–9252. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i31.9245
14. Arora G., Mannalithara A., Mithal A. et al. Concurrent conditions in patients with chronic constipation: a population-based study. PLoS One., 2012, № 7(10). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0042910
15. Alonso-Coello P., Guyatt G., Heel-Ansdell D. et al. Laxatives for the treatment of hemorrhoids. Cochrane Database Systematic Reviews, 2005, № 2005(4), рр. CD004649.
16. Johannsson H.O., Graf W., Påhlman L. Bowel habits in hemorrhoid patients and normal subjects. Am J Gastroenterol., 2005, № 100(2), pp. 401–406. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.40195.x
17. Garg P, Singh P. Adequate dietary fiber supplement along with TONE concept can help avoid surgery in most patients with advanced hemorrhoids. Minerva Gastroenterol Dietol., 2017, № 63(2), pp. 92–96. https://doi.org/10.23736/s1121-421x.17.02364-9
18. Ilkanych A. Ya. Darvin V.V. Zhdanovskiy V.V. The role of latex ligation in the treatment of chronic hemorrhoids. International surgical congress Actual problems of modern surgery, Moscow, 2003, pp. 246. (In Russ.)
19. Zagryadskiy E.A. Minimally invasive surgery of hemorrhoidal disease. M. : GEOTAR-Media, 2014. (In Russ.)
20. Ratto C., de Parades V. Doppler-guided ligation of hemorrhoidal arteries with mucopexy: A technique for the future. J Visc Surg., 2015, № 152(2), pp. 15–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2014.08.003
21. Gain M.Ju. Laser technologies in complex treatment of hemorrhoids. News of surgery, 2013, № 1(21), pp. 94–104 (In Russ.)
22. Kuzminov A.M. Borisov I.F. Hemorrhoidectomy with high energy. Coloproctology, 2009, № 3, pp. 46–52 p. (In Russ.)
23. Shahno E.A. Physical basis in laser appliance in medicine. Saint Petersburg: NIU ITMO, 2012. (In Russ.)
24. Pandini L.C. et al. Surgical treatment of haemorrhoidal disease with CO2 laser and Milligan-Morgan cold scalpel technique. Colorectal Dis., 2006, № 8(7)Ю, pp. 592–595. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2006.01023.x
25. Jahanshahi A., Mashhadizadeh E. Sarmast M.H. Diode laser for treatment of symptomatic hemorrhoid: a short term clinical result of a mini invasive treatment, and one year follow up. Pol Przegl Chir, 2012, № 7(84), pp. 329–332. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10035-012-0055-7
26. Wee I.J.Y. Koo C.H. Seow-En I. Ng Y.Y.R. Lin W. Tan E.J.K. Laser hemorrhoidoplasty versus conventional hemorrhoidectomy for grade II/III hemorrhoids: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Annals of Coloproctology, 2023, № 1(39), pp. 3–10. https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.00598.0085
27. Maloku H. Gashi Z. Lazovic R. Islami H. Juniku-Shkololli A. Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty Procedure vs Open Surgical Hemorrhoidectomy: a Trial Comparing 2 Treatments for Hemorrhoids of Third and Fourth Degree. Acta Inform Med., 2014, № 6(22), pp. 365–367. https://doi.org/10.5455/aim.2014.22.365-367
Review
For citations:
Tariverdiev A.M., Lutsevich O.E., Davidovich D.L., Fedorov A.V., Bogdanov D.Yu. Modern surgical methods of hemorrhois treatment. Literature review. Moscow Surgical Journal. 2023;(4):96-103. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17238/2072-3180-2023-4-96-103