Preview

Moscow Surgical Journal

Advanced search

Obstruction of gastroenteroanastomiosis after laparoscopic gastr bypass in bariatric patients

https://doi.org/10.17238/2072-3180-2023-56-61

Abstract

Introduction. Obstruction of the gastroenteroanastomosis (GEA) is a complication specific to bariatric surgery, the tactics of combating which are not currently standardized, and the problem itself continues to be relevant and debatable.

The aim of the study was to study the features of the diagnosis and treatment of GEA obstruction after laparoscopic gastric bypass.

Materials and methods. A retrospective analysis of the results of 360 laparoscopic gastric bypasses performed at the FSCC FMBA of Russia for the period from 2019 to 2023 was carried out.

Results. In the early postoperative period, GEA obstruction developed in 6 patients (1.7%). In all cases, the complication was resolved conservatively within 3 to 6 days. In the long-term period, GEA obstruction was diagnosed in 9 patients (2.5%) within 28 to 74 days. In all cases, the complication was resolved by endoscopic bougienage and dilatation of the GEA. No one required surgical treatment.

Conclusions. GEA obstruction is a relatively rare complication of laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery, which can be effectively dealt with in a specialized center. If obstruction occurs in the immediate postoperative period, as a rule, conservative therapy is sufficient. With the development of GEA stricture in the long-term period, it is possible to achieve a satisfactory result using endoscopic techniques.

About the Authors

A. V. Smirnov
Federal Research Clinical Center FMBA of Russia
Russian Federation

Smirnov Alexander Vyacheslavovich – Candidate of Medical Sciences

28 Orekhovy Boulevard, Moscow, 115682



V. R. Stankevich
Federal Research Clinical Center FMBA of Russia
Russian Federation

Stankevich Vladimir Romanovich – Candidate of Medical Sciences

28 Orekhovy Boulevard, Moscow, 115682



A. A. Keshvedinova
Federal Research Clinical Center FMBA of Russia
Russian Federation

Keshvedinova Ayshe Ablyayevna

28 Orekhovy Boulevard, Moscow, 115682



Z A. Abdulkerimov
A. I. Evdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry of the Ministry of Health care of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Abdulkerimov Zaipulla Akhmedovich

127473, Moscow, Delegatskaya str., 20, p. 1



A. A. Botov
A. I. Evdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry of the Ministry of Health care of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Botov Alexey Andreevich

127473, Moscow, Delegatskaya str., 20, p. 1



Yu. V. Ivanov
Federal Research Clinical Center FMBA of Russia; A. I. Evdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry of the Ministry of Health care of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Ivanov Yuri Viktorovich – MD, Professor

28 Orekhovy Boulevard, Moscow, 115682

127473, Moscow, Delegatskaya str., 20, p. 1



D. N. Panchenkov
Federal Research Clinical Center FMBA of Russia; A. I. Evdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry of the Ministry of Health care of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Panchenkov Dmitry Nikolaevich – MD, Professor

28 Orekhovy Boulevard, Moscow, 115682

127473, Moscow, Delegatskaya str., 20, p. 1



References

1. Peterson R.M., Scott J.D. Managing Complications of Bariatric Surgery. Adv Surg., 2019, Sep; № 53, рр. 55–68. https://doi:10.1016/j. yasu.2019.04.004.

2. Fakas S., Elias M., Lim D., Meytes V. Comparison of gastrojejunostomy techniques and anastomotic complications: a systematic literature review. Surg Endosc., 2021, Dec; № 35(12), рр. 6489–6496. https://doi:10.1007/s00464-020-08142-x.

3. Spota A., Cereatti F., Granieri S., Antonelli G., Dumont J.L., Dagher I., Chiche R., Catheline J.M., Pourcher G., Rebibo L., Calabrese D., Msika S., Tranchart H., Lainas P., Danan D., Tuszynski T., Pacini F., Arienzo R., Trelles N., Soprani A., Lazzati A., Torcivia A., Genser L., Derhy S., Fazi M., Bouillot J.L., Marmuse J.P., Chevallier J.M., Donatelli G. Endoscopic Management of Bariatric Surgery Complications According to a Standardized Algorithm. Obes Surg., 2021, Oct; № 31(10), рр. 4327–4337. https://doi:10.1007/s11695-021-05577-6

4. Khrucharoen U., Weitzner Z.N., Chen Y., Dutson E.P. Incidence and risk factors for early gastrojejunostomy anastomotic stricture requiring endoscopic intervention following laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a MBSAQIP analysis. Surg Endosc., 2022, Jun; № 36(6), рр. 3833–3842. https://doi:10.1007/s00464-021-08700-x

5. Epub 2021 Sep 1. PMID: 34471978.

6. Almby K., Edholm D. Anastomotic Strictures After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: a Cohort Study from the Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry. Obes Surg., 2019, Jan; № 29(1), рр. 172–177. https://doi:10.1007/ s11695-018-3500-9

7. Vedantam S., Roberts J. Endoscopic Stents in the Management of Bariatric Complications: Our Algorithm and Outcomes. Obes Surg., 2020, Mar; № 30(3), рр. 1150–1158. https://doi:10.1007/s11695-019-04284-7


Review

For citations:


Smirnov A.V., Stankevich V.R., Keshvedinova A.A., Abdulkerimov Z.A., Botov A.A., Ivanov Yu.V., Panchenkov D.N. Obstruction of gastroenteroanastomiosis after laparoscopic gastr bypass in bariatric patients. Moscow Surgical Journal. 2023:56-61. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17238/2072-3180-2023-56-61

Views: 447


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2072-3180 (Print)