Quality of life in patients after laparoscopic hernioplasty: relapse of the disease and chronic pain syndrome
https://doi.org/10.17238/2072-3180-2021-3-9-14
Abstract
Objective. The main factors of reducing the quality of life of patients after surgical treatment of inguinal hernias are recurrence of the disease (R) and the development of chronic pain syndrome (CPS).
Material and methods. The results of surgical treatment of 1897 patients with inguinal hernias who underwent laparoscopic hernioplasty using the TARR method are analyzed. The aim of the study was to identify the causes of CPS development and recurrence of inguinal hernia, depending on the type and size of the mesh, as well as the technical features of the operation. In 842 patients, a self - fixing ProGrip ™ mesh was used, in 1054 patients - a light composite VYPRO II mesh.
Results. In group 1, recurrence of inguinal hernia was noted in 1 patient (0.12%) with a small size of mesh (less than 120 cm2), in group 2 (control) - in 7 (0.66%), including when using relatively large mesh (more than 140 cm2). The cause of recurrence is the migration of the mesh due to its insufficient size or fixation. CPS was observed in 1 patient of the main group, whereas in the control group there were 13 such patients. The reasons are directly related to the method of fixing the mesh: direct contact of the metal bracket with a nerve branch or the development of a scar in the area of the suture or fixing element.
Conclusions. A self-fixing implant of sufficient size (at least 10x15 cm), which ensures the" sticking " of the mesh over the entire surface, reliably protects the patient from both the development of CBC and the recurrence of the disease. An indirect cause of relapse may also be an increase in the patient's body weight after surgery.
About the Authors
O. E. Lutsevich
Department of faculty surgery no. 1, Moscow state medical University named after A. I. Evdokimov
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Oleg E. Lutsevich, MD, Professor, Corresponding Member of the
Russian Academy of Sciences, Honored Doctor of the Russian Federation, Laureate of the Russian Government Award, Head
127473, Moscow, Russia, Delegatskaya str., 20, p. 1, Chief Surgeon of TSELT CJSC
K. T. Alibekov
Department of faculty surgery no. 1, Moscow state medical University named after A. I. Evdokimov
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Kubanychbek T. Alibekov, surgeon
127473,Moscow, Russia, Delegatskaya str., 20, p. 1
A. S. Urbanovich
Department of faculty surgery no. 1, Moscow state medical University named after A. I. Evdokimov
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Andrey S. Urbanovich, Candidate of Medical Sciences, Assistant
127473, Moscow, Russia, Delegatskaya str., 20, p. 1
References
1. References:
2. Bondarev G. A., Logachev S. V., Mosolova A.V. Analysis of recurrent hernias of the lower abdominal wall after surgical treatment. Almanac of the Institute of Surgery named after A.V. Vishnevsky, 2017, № 1, pp. 318–320. (In Russ.)
3. Bykov A.V., Myakonky R. V. Assessment of the frequency of recurrence of inguinal hernias depending on the experience of the operating surgeon. Collection of theses of the V Congress of the South of Russia. Rostovon-Don, 2017, pp. 124–125. (In Russ.)
4. Pavlyuk G. V., Bujor P. V., Moraru V. A., etc. The use of auto-and alloplastic materials in the treatment of recurrent inguinal hernias. Almanac of the A.V. Vishnevsky Institute of Surgery, 2017, № 1, pp. 701–702. (In Russ.)
5. Pakhomova A. R., Kochetova L. V., Petrushko S. I., etc. Constitutional peculiarities of patients with inguinal hernias [Electronic resource]. Modern problems of science and education, 2016, № 6. (In Russ.)
6. Magomedov M. M., Magomedbekov R. E. On the issue of evaluating the choice of the optimal variant of hernioplasty in men of reproductive age. Collection of theses of the V Congress of the South of Russia. Rostov-on-Don, 2017, p. 197. (In Russ.)
7. Ilchenko F. N., Artemov Yu. V., Ablaev E. E., etc. Substantiation of the therapeutic and diagnostic algorithm in patients with inguinal hernia using ultrasound data of the abdominal wall. Bulletin of emergency and reconstructive surgery, 2016, Vol. 1, № 2, pp. 191–193. (In Russ.)
8. Berebitsky S. S., Belyakov Yu. N., Andreev V. A., etc. Features of the treatment of recurrent inguinal hernias. Current issues of surgery: Mater. Vseros. nauch. - prakt. konf. s mezhdunar. participation, dedication. to the 85th anniversary of the NUZ “Separate Clinical Hospital at the Penza station of JSC “Russian Railways”. Penza, 2015, p. 88 –90. (In Russ.)
9. Borisova I. Y., Slavin L. E., Aliullova R. R. et al. Evaluation of the frequency of relapses after hernia repair operations depending on the individual characteristics of the connective tissue of patients. Actual issues of geraniology: mater. conf. Moscow, 2013, pp. 25–26. (In Russ.)
10. Grigoriev S. G., Krivoshchekov E. P., Ivanov S. A., Grigorieva T. S. Inguinal hernias. Samara: LLC “Book”, 2013, 160 p. (In Russ.)
11. Timerbulatov V. M., Timerbulatov Sh. V., Gataullina E. Z., etc. Postoperative ventral hernias: the current state of the problem. Medical Bulletin of Bashkortostan, 2013, Vol. 8, № 5, pp. 101–110. (In Russ.)
12. Khorava V. G., Torgunakov A. P., Demidov D. G., etc. Advantages of pre-peritoneal hernioplasty from semilunar pararectal access in the surgical treatment of recurrent inguinal hernias. Multidisciplinary hospital: integration of specialties: mater. XVIII All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conf. Moscow, 2014, pp. 166–167. (In Russ.)
13. Raimkhanov A.D., Aimagambetov M. Zh., Noso Y. Results of surgical treatment of recurrent and large inguinal-scrotal hernias. Science and Healthcare, 2016, № 1, pp. 89–97. (In Russ.)
14. Topuria G., Topuzov E. E., Abdulaev M. A. The choice of the hernioplasty method in the development of relapse after inguinal hernia removal using a mesh allograft. Successes of modern science and education, 2016, Vol. 6, № 10, pp. 131-137. (In Russ.)
15. Kalish Yu. I., Ametov L. Z., Shausupov A. R., etc. Chronic paraprotic infection after allogernioplasty. Medical perspectives, 2016, Vol. 21, № 4, pp. 62–66.
16. Amirdzhanova V. N., Goryachev D. V., Korshunov N. I., Rebrov A. P., Sorotskaya V. N. Population indicators of quality of life according to the SF-36 questionnaire (results of the multicenter study of quality of life “Mi-razh”). Scientific and practical rheumatology, 2008, № 1, pp. 36–48. (In Russ.)
17. Kukosh M. V., Vlasov A.V., Gomozov G. I. Prevention of early postoperative complications during endoprosthetics of ventral hernias. Surgery news, 2012, vol. 20, № 5, pp. 32–37. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Lutsevich O.E., Alibekov K.T., Urbanovich A.S. Quality of life in patients after laparoscopic hernioplasty: relapse of the disease and chronic pain syndrome. Moscow Surgical Journal. 2021;(3):9-14. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17238/2072-3180-2021-3-9-14
Views:
708
Email this article 