FORMATION OF ENDOTHELIAL DYSFUNCTION IN COMPLICATED POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD IN UROLITHIASE
https://doi.org/10.17238/issn2072-3180.2020.2.96-102
Abstract
Introduction. Urea disease is one of the most common diseases in the world, affecting almost 3% of the population, mainly people of working age from 40 to 50 years, which determines the relevance of a comprehensive study of this disease. The aim of the study was to study the mechanism of endothelial dysfunction formation in the complicated course of the postoperative period in patients with urolithiasis.
Materials and methods. The study included 90 patients with urolithiasis who had operational interventions in the urology department of the Russian Railways-Medicine Clinical Hospital of Krasnoyarsk between 2017 and 2019. The age of patients with urolithiasis in our study was from 19 to 82 years, with a median age of 54 [37; 69] years.
Results. The risk of postoperative complications in urolithiasis increases with increasing indices of terminal and total blebbing of plasma membrane of lymphocytes and increasing expression of lymphocytes activated by CD 31 and CD 38.
Conclusion. Patients with a predicted risk of developing complications in the postoperative period need a choice of treatment tactics and postoperative therapy aimed at preventing the development of a complicated course of the disease.
About the Authors
A. G. BerezhnoyRussian Federation
Berezhnoy Alexander Grigoryevich - PhDs in Medicine., associate professor
Partizana Zheleznyaka St., 1, Krasnoyarsk, 660022
Yu. S. Vinnik
Russian Federation
Vinnik Yuriy Semyonovich - professor, MD, the head
Partizana Zheleznyaka St., 1, Krasnoyarsk, 660022
S. S. Dunaevskaya
Russian Federation
Dunaevskaya Svetlana Sergeevna - professor, MD, professor
Partizana Zheleznyaka St., 1, Krasnoyarsk, 660022
References
1. Nicolle L.E. Urinary tract in geriatric and institutionalized patients. Current Opinion in Urology, 2002, 12 (1), рр. 51–55.
2. Berezhnoy A.G., Vinnik Yu.S., Dunaevskaya S.S., Antyufrieva D.A. Vozmozhnosti prognozirovaniya razvitiya vospalitel’nyh oslozhnenij posleoperacionnogo perioda u bol’nyh s mochekamennoj bolezn’yu [Possibilities to predict the development of inflammatory complications of the postoperative period in patients with urolithia sis]. Bulletin of new medical technologies. Electronic edition, 2019, 2, pp. 109–113. (In Russian)
3. Trapeznikova M.F., Dutov V.V., Rumyantsev A.A., Tumanyan V.G. Distancionnaya udarno-volnovaya litotripsiya v lechenii urolitiaza distopirovannyh pochek [A remote shock and wave lithotripsy in treatment of an urolitiaz of dihundred-pyrobathing kidneys]. Saratov scientific and medical magazine, 2011, No. S2, T. 7, pp. 245–248. (In Russian)
4. Zhuravlev V.N., Danilov V.O., Bazhenov I.V., Berestetsky I.E., Borzunov I.V., Vakhlov S. G., Makaryan A.A. Perkutannaya nefrolitotripsiya: algoritm dejstvij pri vyyavlenii krovotecheniya iz pochechnyh sosudov [Perkutannaya nefrolitotripsiya: an algorithm of actions at detection of bleeding from kidney vessels]. Ural medical magazine, 2016, No. 1 (134), pp. 10–13. (In Russian)
5. Malkhasyan V. A., Semenyakin I.V., Ivanov V.Yu., Suhih S.O., Gadzhiyev N.K. Obzor oslozhnenij perkutannoj nefrolitotomii i metodov ih lecheniya [Review of complications of a perkutanny nefrolitotomiya and methods of their treatment]. Urology, 2018, No. 4, pp. 147–153. (In Russian)
6. Rossolovsky A.N., Chekhonatskaya M.L., Zakharova N.B., Berezinets O.L., Yemelyanova N.V. Dinamicheskaya ocenka sostoyaniya pochechnoj parenhimy u bol’nyh posle distancionnoj udarno-volnovoj litotripsii kamnej pochek [Dynamic assessment of a condition of a kidney parenchyma at patients after a remote shock and wave lithotripsy of stones of kidneys]. Messenger of urology, 2014, No. 2, pp. 3–14. (In Russian)
7. Zhebentyaev A.A. Konservativnoe lechenie i distancionnaya litotripsiya pri lechenii mochekamennoj bolezni [Conservative treatment and a remote lithotripsy at treatment of an urolithic disease]. Bulletin of the Vitebsk state medical university, 2007, T.6, No. 3, pp. 5–12. (In Russian)
8. Dzeranov N.K. Ambulatornaya distancionnaya litotripsiya – za i protiv [Outpatient extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy – for and against]. Nauchno-medicinskij vestnik Central’nogo CHernozem’ya, 2011. No. 34. pp. 74–75. (In Russian)
9. Bova S.I., Bova F.S., Dolyatovsky V.V., Rycheva S.B. Distancionnaya litotripsiya kak metod vybora lecheniya rezidual’nyh konkrementov verhnih mochevyh putej [Remote lithotripsy as method of the choice of treatment of residual concrements of the top uric ways]. Saratov scientific and medical magazine, 2011, No. S2, V. 7, p. 125. (In Russian)
10. Dutov V.V. Distancionnaya udarno-volnovaya litotripsiya: nazad v budushchee [Remote shock and wave lithotripsy: back in the future]. RMZh, 2014, No. 29, V. 22, pp. 2077–2086. (In Russian)
11. Kondratieva T.S., Babintseva A.Yu. Ocenka blebbing-fenomena kak metod diagnostiki stepeni tyazhesti diabeticheskoj polinejropatii [Evaluation of the blebbing phenomenon as a method of diagnosing the severity of diabetic polyneuropathy]. Bulletin of the Council of Young Scientists and Specialists of the Chelyabinsk Region, 2018, No. 2(3), pp. 98–102. (In Russian)
12. Tixeira R., Phan T.K., Caruso S., Shi B., Atkin-Smith G.K., Nedeva C., Chow J.D.Y., Puthalakath H., Hulett M.D., Herold M.J., Poon I.K.H. ROCK1 but not LIMK1 or PAK2 is a key regulator of apoptotic membrane blebbing and cell disassembly. Cell Death Differ., 2020, No. 27(1), pp. 102–116.
13. Obeidy P., Ju L.A., Oehlers S.H., Zulkhernain N.S., Lee Q., Galeano Niño J.L., Kwan R.Y., Tikoo S., Cavanagh L.L., Mrass P., Cook A.J., Jackson S.P., Biro M., Roediger B., Sixt M., Weninger W. Partial loss of actin nucleator actin-related protein 2/3 activity triggers blebbing in primary T lymphocytes. Immunol Cell Biol., 2020, 98(2), pp. 93–113.
14. Moroz V.V., Salmina A.B., Fursov A.A., Mikhutkina S.V., Linev K.A., Mantorova N.S., Shakhmaeva S.V., Olkhovsky I.V., Isakov I.V. Rol’ membrannyh vysvobozhdennyh mikrochastic v patogeneze sistemnogo vospalitel’nogo otveta [Role of membrane released microparticles in the pathogenesis of systemic inflammatory response]. Vestnik Rossijskoj akademii medicinskih nauk, 2010, No. 4, pp. 3–8. (In Russian)
15. Vinnik Yu.S., Dunaevskaya S.S., Antyufrieva D.A., Deulina V.V. Mikrochasticy limfocitarnogo proiskhozhdeniya – patogeneticheskij marker nekrotiziruyushchego pankreatita [Microparticles of lymphocytic origin are a pathogenetic marker of necrotizing pancreatitis]. Experimental and clinical gastroenterology, 2019, No. 5(165), pp. 84–90. (In Russian)
Review
For citations:
Berezhnoy A.G., Vinnik Yu.S., Dunaevskaya S.S. FORMATION OF ENDOTHELIAL DYSFUNCTION IN COMPLICATED POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD IN UROLITHIASE. Moscow Surgical Journal. 2020;(3):96-102. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17238/issn2072-3180.2020.2.96-102