Effectiveness of various methods of hernioplasty in young men (literature review)
https://doi.org/10.17238/2072-3180-2024-3-185-195
Abstract
Groin hernias are common in the human population: they occur in 27–43 % of men and 3–6 % of women. They account for 80 % of all abdominal hernias. Hernioplasty is one of the most commonly performed surgical interventions. Currently, non-tension hernioplasty is actively used. The Lichtenstein method of inguinal hernia repair and laparoscopy are the most common techniques worldwide.
The results of the review show that different techniques of open and laparoscopic procedures with mesh hernioplasty have no significant effect on male infertility. However, prosthetic mesh hernioplasty may lead to adverse events such as ejaculatory duct obstruction, obstructive azoospermia, oligospermia, and the development of infertility in the male population due to fibrosis resulting from postoperative bleeding, adhesions, and postoperative exercise friction. Additional factors that may affect infertility may include patient age, employment status, psychological factors, and environment.
Overall, it can be noted that the main attention should be focused on the standardization of surgical procedures and methods of prevention of intra- and postoperative complications in order to avoid or reduce their pathological impact on the reproductive health and quality of life of the patient.
About the Authors
D. M. Cherkasov
FGBOU VO Rostov State Medical University MZ RF
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Cherkasov Denis Mikhailovich – doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Department of Surgical Diseases № 2,
29, Nakhichevansky per., Rostov-on-Don, 344022.
I. E. Kerimov
FGBOU VO Rostov State Medical University MZ RF
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Kerimov Ibragim Eldarovich – postgraduate student, Department of Surgical Diseases №2,
29, Nakhichevansky per., Rostov-on-Don, 344022.
M. F. Cherkasov
FGBOU VO Rostov State Medical University MZ RF
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Cherkasov Mikhail Fedorovich – doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Head of Surgery Department №4,
29, Nakhichevansky per., Rostov-on-Don, 344022.
A. B. Namatyan
FGBOU VO Rostov State Medical University MZ RF
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Namatyan Artur Borisovich – Surgeon,
29, Nakhichevansky per., Rostov-on-Don, 344022.
D. D. Kucher
FGBOU VO Rostov State Medical University MZ RF
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Kucher Darya Denisovna – Student,
29, Nakhichevansky per., Rostov-on-Don, 344022.
References
1. Vnukov P.V. To the question about the assessment of reproductive sphere and quality of life in men in the postoperative period after inguinal hernioplasty. Nauka yunykh, 2014, № 3, рр. 64–71. (In Russ.)
2. Gvenetadze T.K., Giorgobiani G.T., Archvadze V.Sh., Gulbani L.O. Prophylaxis of male infertility development after different methods of inguinal hernioplasty using mesh explant. Surgery News, 2014, vol. 22 (3), рр. 379–385. (In Russ.)
3. Damadaev D.M., Khamidov M.A., Magomedov M.M. Modern methods of hernioplasty and their effectiveness in young men. Modern Science: Actual Problems of Theory and Practice. Series: Natural and Technical Sciences, 2022, № 04/2, рр. 179–186 (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37882/2223-2966.2022.04-2.09
4. Kireev A.A., Bogdanov D.Yu., Alishikhov Sh.A., Kolesnikov M.V. Comparative analysis of immediate and distant results of inguinal allogernioplastikas. Endoscopic Surgery, 2009, № 4, рр. 6–10.
5. Kulchenko N.G. Groin hernioplasty and male health. Re-search’n Practical Medicine Journal, 2019, № 6(3), рр. 65–73. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17709/2409-2231-2019-6-3-6
6. Mamadieva F.H. History of inguinal hernia treatment. Avicenna, 2018, № 27, рр. 45–48. EDN YTGYMX. (In Russ.)
7. Yu. S. Vinnik et al. Operative treatment of hernias of the anterior abdominal wall. Krasnoyarsk: KrasGMU, 2011, т. 1, 260 р. (In Russ.)
8. Parshikov V., Baburin A., Khodak V., Petrov V., Dvornikov A., Mironov A., Romanov R., Tsybusov S. Choice of synthetic endoprosthesis for surgical treatment of inguinal hernias according to I.L. Lichtenstein. Vestnik of Experimental and Clinical Surgery, 2013, т. 6, № 2, рр. 155–160. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18499/2070-478X-2013-6-2-155-160
9. Protasov A.V., Kulchenko N.G., Vinogradov I.V. Association of unstretched inguinal hernioplasty and pathospermia in men of reproductive age. Surgery. Zhurnal im. NI Pirogov, 2020, № 10, рр. 44–48. (In Russ.)
10. Sverchinskaya A.A., Kukharev D.Yu., Semenchuk I.D. Comparison of types of inguinal hernia hernioplasty. Internauka: electron. nauchn. Zhurn, 2018, № 15(49). URL: https://internauka.org/journal/science/internauka/49 (circulation date: 22.06.2024). (In Russ.)
11. Chernykh V.G., Krainyukov P.E., Simonenko A.V. Prophylaxis of the im-plant-associated inflammation in the area of the seminal canal at allo-hernioplasty. Clinical Medicine, 2019, т. 97, № 89, рр. 603–607.
12. Ahmadinejad I., Jalali A., Ahmadinejad M., Soltanian A., Ahamdinejad Y., Shirzadi A., Chaghamirzayi P. Inguinal hernia: Lichtenstein VS Shouldice technique repair: A randomized controlled trial. Surg Open Sci., 2024, Jan 15, № 17, рр. 70–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sopen.2024.01.001
13. Bracale U., Melillo P., Piaggio D., et al. Is Shouldice the best NONMESH inguinal hernia repair technique? A systematic review and network metanalysis of randomized controlled trials comparing Shouldice and Desarda. Int J Surg., 2019, № 62, рр. 12–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.01.001
14. Cantay H., Ezer M., Binnetoglu K., Uslu M., Anuk T., Bayram H. What Is the Effect of Inguinal Hernia Operations on Sexual Functions? Cureus, 2022, № 14(4), рр. e24137. Published 2022 Apr 14. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.24137
15. Chen L., Hu M., Huang S. Analysis of influencing factors of complications after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: An observational study. Medicine, 2023, № 102(49), рр. e36516. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000036516
16. Cui D., Han G., Shang Y., et al. Antisperm antibodies in infertile men and their effect on semen parameters: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Clin Chim Acta, 2015, № 444, рр. 29–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2015.01.033
17. Ece İ., Yılmaz H. An overlooked complication of the inguinal hernia repair: Dysejaculation. Turk J Surg., 2018, № 34(1), рр. 1–4. https://doi.org/10.5152/UCD.2015.4103
18. Emile S.H., Elfeki H. Desarda’s technique versus Lichtenstein technique for the treatment of primary inguinal hernia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Hernia, 2018, vol. 22, № 3, рр. 385–395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-017-1666-z
19. Gedam B.S., Bansod P.Y., Kale V.B., Shah Y., Akhtar M. A comparative study of Desarda’s technique with Lichtenstein mesh repair in treatment of inguinal hernia: A prospective cohort study. Int J Surg., 2017, №3 9. рр. 150–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.01.083
20. HerniaSurge Group. International guidelines for groin hernia management. Hernia, 2018, № 22(1), рр. 1–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-017-1668-x
21. Hetzer F.H., Hotz T., Steinke W., et al. Gold standard for inguinal hernia repair: Shouldice or Lichtenstein? Hernia, 1999, № 3, рр. 117–120.
22. Lorenz R., Arlt G., Conze J., et al. Shouldice standard 2020: review of the current literature and results of an international consensus meeting. Hernia, 2021, № 25(5), рр. 1199–1207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029020-02365-6
23. Melwani R., Malik S.J., Arija D., et al. Body Mass Index and Inguinal Hernia: An Observational Study Focusing on the Association of Inguinal Hernia With Body Mass Index. Cureus, 2020, № 12(11), рр. e11426. Published 2020 Nov 10. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.11426
24. Memon G.A., Shah S.K.A., Habib-Ur-Rehman. An experience with mesh versus darn repair in inguinal hernias. Pak J Med Sci., 2017, № 33(3), рр. 699–702. https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.333.13257
25. Mohamedahmed A.Y.Y, Ahmad H., Abdelmabod A.A.N., Sillah A.K. Non-mesh Desarda Technique Versus Standard Mesh-Based Lichtenstein Technique for Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. World J Surg., 2020, № 44(10), рр. 3312–3321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-020-05587-y
26. Sajid M.S., Leaver C., Baig M.K., Sains P. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the use of lightweight versus heavyweight mesh in open inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg., 2012, № 99(1), рр. 29–37. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.7718
27. Swanson J.A., Chapler F.K. Infertility as a consequence of bilateral herniorrhaphies. Fertil Steril., 1977, № 28(10), рр. 1118–1120. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(16)42866-9
28. Yamaguchi K., Ishikawa T., Nakano Y., Kondo Y., Shiotani M., Fujisawa M. Rapidly progressing, late-onset obstructive azoospermia linked to herniorrhaphy with mesh. Fertil Steril, 2008, № 90(5), рр. 2018e5–2018e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.04.062
29. Yan L., Zhang P., Lu Z., Luo B., Xu P. Characteristics analysis and procedure selection of inguinal hernia in young male: a report of 142 cases. Chinese J Hernia Abdominal Wall Surgery (Electronic Version), 2015, № 9(6), рр. 23–24.
Review
For citations:
Cherkasov D.M., Kerimov I.E., Cherkasov M.F., Namatyan A.B., Kucher D.D. Effectiveness of various methods of hernioplasty in young men (literature review). Moscow Surgical Journal. 2024;(3):185-195. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17238/2072-3180-2024-3-185-195
Views:
234
Email this article 