Expression of inflammatory process and wound healing rate after regional conduction anesthesia in surgical treatment of the lower extremities: a prospective study
https://doi.org/10.17238/2072-3180-2023-4-15-21
Abstract
Introduction. Conduction anesthesia under ultrasound control of nerve plexuses and peripheral nerves should be recognized as the most optimal type of anesthesia during surgeries on the upper and lower extremities. However, the effect of the used anesthesia tactics and various anesthetic aids on wound healing has not been clearly proved.
The aim – comparative analysis of inflammatory process expression and wound healing rate in patients with shrapnel wounds of the lower extremities after using different tactics of conduction anesthesia during surgical treatment.
Materials and methods of research. An observational prospective cohort study of 147 patients who underwent surgery for shrapnel wounds of the lower extremities was carried out. The patients were observed in 4 groups depending on the anesthesia tactics. Data analysis was performed using descriptive statistical methods, comparative analysis using Wilcoxon and Mann-Whitney criteria.
Treatment results. Intergroup analysis of one of the main indicators of the efficacy of the treatment, which characterizes the rate of wound healing, showed a significant difference in the group of patients who received conductive anesthesia of the sciatic nerve branches at the level of the fossa of the hamstrings according under ultrasound control during surgery (p< 0.05 by Mann-Whitney test), when compared to the groups that underwent surgery with conductive anesthesia of the sciatic nerve through gluteal access with blockade of the femoral nerve under ultrasound control, with conductive anesthesia of the femoral nerve under ultrasound control, as well as with local anesthesia, respectively.
Conclusion. The anesthetic aid developed during the study has a positive effect on tissue proliferation and regeneration after surgical treatment of shrapnel wounds of the lower extremities.
About the Authors
D. E. AgafonovRussian Federation
Agafonov Dmitry Evgenievich – Head of the Department
Bolshaya Olenya str., 8, Moscow, 107014
P. E. Kraynyukov
Russian Federation
Krayniukov Pavel Evgenievich – MD, PhD, Associate Professor. Professor of the Department of Hospital Surgery with a course of pediatric Surgery of the Medical Institute of the Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation, Miklukho-Maklaya str., 6, Moscow 117198;
Head
Bolshaya Olenya str., 8, Moscow, 107014
M. Yu. Yakovlev
Russian Federation
Yakovlev Maxim Yuryevich – Doctor. Sci. (Med.), deputy director for strategic development of Medical Activities;
Associate Professor, Department of General Hygiene
32 Novy Arbat, Moscow, 121099
E. A. Valtseva
Russian Federation
Valtseva Elena Alekseevna – Cand. Sci. (Biol.), leading researcher
32 Novy Arbat, Moscow, 121099
References
1. Bolshakov I.N., Baitinger V.F., Rabinovich S.A. Conductor anesthesia (search algorithms and actions): Textbook. Manual. M. : PolyMediaPress, 2016, 162 p. (In Russ.)
2. Shchikota A.M., Pogonchenkova I.V., Gumenyuk S.A. Urgent diagnosis of musculoskeletal injury: possibilities of ultrasound method. Practical. medits., 2021, № 19(3), рр. 81–86. (In Russ.)
3. Gadzhiev A.I. Local anesthesia is an effective way to stimulate wound healing. Laser. medits., 2014, № 18(4), рp. 15–16. (In Russ.)
4. Kesici S., Kesici U., Ulusoy H., Erturkuner P., Turkmen A., Arda O. Effects of local anesthetics on wound healing. Braz. J. Anesthesiol., 2018, № 68(4), рр. 375–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjan.2018.01.016
5. Vasseur P.B., Paul H.A., Dybdal N., Crumley L. Effects of local anesthetics on healing of abdominal wounds in rabbits. Comparative Study Am. J. Vet. Res., 1984, № 45(11), рр. 2385–2388.
6. Sanchez M.F., Guzman M.L., Apas A.L., Alovero F. del L., Olivera M.E. Sustained dual release of ciprofloxacin and lidocaine from ionic exchange responding film based on alginate and hyaluronate for wound healing. Eur. J. of Pharmaceutical Sci., 2021, № 161, рр. 105789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejps.2021.105789
7. Zeren S., Kesici S., Kesici U., Isbilir S., Turkmen U.A., Ulusoy H., Karpuz V., Ozcan O., Polat E., Ipcioglu O.M., Sari M.K. Effects of levobupivacaine on wound healing. Anesth. Analg., 2013, № 116, рр. 495–499. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0b013e318273f48e
8. Dere K., Sen H., Teksoz E., Ozkan S., Dagli G., Sucullu I., Filiz A.I., Ipcioglu O.M., Kucukodaci Z. The comparison of the effects of different doses of levobupivacaine infiltration on wound healing. J. Invest. Surg., 2009, № 22(2), рр. 112–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941930802713019
9. Hanci V., Hakimoglu S., Özaçmak H., Bektaş S., Özaçmak H.S., Özdamar S.O., Yurtlu S., Turan I.Ö. Comparison of the effects of bupivacaine, lidocaine, and tramadol infiltration on wound healing in rats. Rev. Bras. Anestesiol., 2012, № 62(6), рр. 799–810. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-7094(12)70180-0
10. Bayalieva A.Z., Yankovich Y.N., Mohsin M., Davydova V.R. Possibilities of clinical application of articaine. Regional Anesthesia and Acute Pain Management, 2022, № 16(2), рр. 103–114. https://doi.org/10.17816/RA108091
11. Kesici S., Kesici U., Ulusoyc H., Erturkuner P., Turkmene A., Arda O. Effects of local anesthetics on wound healing. Rev. Bras. Anestesiol., 2018, № 68(4), рр. 375–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjane.2018.01.020
12. Koryshkov N.A., Larionov S.V., Murashova N.A., Sobolev K.A. Anesthesia during operations on the foot and ankle joint (literature review). Traumatol. and an orthopedic surgeon of Russia, 2012, № 3(65), рp. 118–126. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Agafonov D.E., Kraynyukov P.E., Yakovlev M.Yu., Valtseva E.A. Expression of inflammatory process and wound healing rate after regional conduction anesthesia in surgical treatment of the lower extremities: a prospective study. Moscow Surgical Journal. 2023;(4):15-21. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17238/2072-3180-2023-4-15-21