Using local negative pressure to preserve the mesh prosthesis in late purulent – necrotic complications of hernioplasty
https://doi.org/10.17238/2072-3180-2025-4-195-201
Abstract
Introduction. Hernioplasty remains one of the most common surgical interventions. The “gold standard” in our time is tension – free hernioplasty using mesh implants, which, on the one hand, has reduced the number of relapses, but on the other hand is associated with the development of postoperative complications caused by infection of the prosthesis. The literature provides data on the preservation of mesh implants in the event of early complications.
Objectives. To study the available literature on postoperative complications after hernioplasty using mesh implants.
Materials and methods. Analysis of available literature data.
Results. The available literature data of domestic and foreign authors on postoperative complications after hernioplasty with the use of mesh implants are analyzed. The question of preserving the implant in the late period remains open.
Conclusion. An analysis of the literature data has shown that the use of LNP to preserve a mesh implant in case of late complications remains an urgent issue.
About the Authors
V. A. Kislyakov
Hospital of A.K. Yeramishantseva;
RUDN University named after Patrice Lumumba
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Kislyakov Valery Aleksandrovich – Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor of the Department of Hospital Surgery with the course of Pediatric Surgery; Head of the Department of Purulent Surgery, Department of Health,
117198, Miklukho-Maklaj str., 6, Moscow;
129327, str. Lenskaya 15, Moscow
L. K. Misharina
Hospital of A.K. Yeramishantseva
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Misharina Liya Konstantinovna – surgeon
129327, st. Lenskaya 15, Moscow
E. M. Gorshunova
Hospital of A.K. Yeramishantseva
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Gorshunova Elena Mikhailovna – surgeon
129327, st. Lenskaya 15, Moscow
K. A. Shiboldenkova
RUDN University named after Patrice Lumumba
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Shiboldenkova Kseniya Aleksandrovna – Postgraduate student of the Department of Hospital Surgery with the course of Pediatric Surgery
117198, MiklukhoMaklaj str., 6, Moscow
H. Otman
RUDN University named after Patrice Lumumba
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Othman Hassan – Postgraduate student of the Department of Hospital Surgery with the course of Pediatric Surgery
117198, Miklukho-Maklaj str., 6, Moscow
References
1. .Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation. Clinical guidelines. Postoperative ventral hernia. M., 2021, pp. 3.
2. Balatsky E.R., Klimenko V.A. Modified multilayer alloplasty of problematic inguinal hernias. Surgical Practice, 2023, № 4, pp. 21–29. (In Russ.)
3. Fedyushkin V.V., Pyatakov S.N. The first experience of using vacuum therapy in the prevention of suppuration of sutured soft tissue wounds. Wounds and Wound Infections. Journal named after Prof. B. M. Kostyuchenok, 2022, № 9(4), pp. 6–15. (In Russ.)
4. Kazakova V.V., Yartsev P.A. Prosthetic plastic surgery of the abdominal wall in the treatment of patients with abdominal midline hernias (literature review). Bulletin of New Medical Technologies. Electronic edition, 2021, № 5. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/proteziruyuschaya-plastika-bryushnoy-stenki-v-lechenii-patsientov-so-sredinnymi-gryzhami-zhivota-obzor-literatury
5. Kislyakov V.A., Artemyev A.A. Is it possible to preserve the implant in case of late complications after hernioplasty in patients with diabetes mellitus. Diabetes mellitus, its complications, and surgical infections. Collection of scientific papers of the 4th International Scientific and Practical Congress, November 19–21, 2019. M. : Pero Publishing House, 2019, pp. 39.
6. Wilson R.B., Farooque Y. Risks and prevention of surgical site infection after hernia mesh repair and the predictive utility of ACSNSQIP. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2022, № 4, pp. 950–964.
7. Degovtsov E.N., Kolyadko P.V. Seromas as a complication of surgical treatment of postoperative hernias of the anterior abdominal wall using mesh implants: the current state of the problem. Surgery News, 2018, № 1. (In Russ.) https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/seromy-kak-oslozhnenie-hirurgicheskogo-lecheniya-posleoperatsionnyh-gryzh-peredney-bryushnoy-stenki-s-ispolzovaniem-setchatyh
8. Cherkasov M.F., Cherkasov D.M. Clinical Evaluation of the Vacuum Therapy Method in the Complex Treatment of Infected Postoperative Wounds of the Frontal Abdominal Wall. Clinical and Expert Surgery. Journal named after Academician B. V. Petrovsky, 2024, № 3(12), pp. 61–68. (In Russ.)
9. Alhussini M.A., Awad A.T., et al. Using quilting sutures in decreasing seroma formation after managing large ventral hernias: a comparative study. Hernia, 2019, № 4(23), pp. 717–722.
10. Stoyko Yu.M., Levchuk A.L. Application of the Local Negative Pressure Method in the Complex Treatment of Patients with Wound Infection. Bulletin of Surgut State University. Medicine, 2021, № 2 (48). (In Russ.) https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/primenenie-metoda-lokalnogo-otritsatelnogo-davleniya-v-kompleksnom-lechenii-patsientov-s-ranevoy-infektsiey
11. Samartsev V.A., Gavrilov V.A. Prevention of Wound Infectious Complications after Mesh Hernioplasty: Experimental and Clinical Research. Clinical and Experimental Surgery. Journal named after Academician B. V. Petrovsky, 2020, No. 1(8), pp. 12–21. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33029/2308-1198-2020-8-1-12-21
12. Obolensky V.N., Enokhov V.Yu. Clinical Effectiveness of Using the Local Negative Pressure Method for Treating Infectious Wound Complications after Non–Tension Hernioplasty. Medical Alphabet, 2018, No. 9 (346), pp. 45–49. (In Russ.)
13. Kislyakov V.A., Artemyev A.A. Modern approach to the treatment of late complications after hernioplasty. Moscow Surgical Journal, 2022, № 3, pp. 81–85. (In Russ.)
14. Kovalev A.A., Danilov I.N. Clinical case of treatment of a patient with postoperative ventral hernia and a complicated postoperative course in the form of infection of the mesh prosthesis. Moscow Surgical Journal, 2020, №4, pp. 101–111. (In Russ.)
15. Kulchenko N.G. Open Non-Tension Hernioplasty: Advantages and Disadvantages. Russian Medical Journal, 2023, № 8, pp. 15–19. (In Russ.)
16. Levchuk A.L., Sysoev O.Yu. Application of the local negative pressure method in the treatment of patients with infected mesh endoprostheses after hernioplasty. Bulletin of the N. I. Pirogov National Research Medical Center, 2020, № 15(4), pp. 91–95. (In Russ.) https://doi: 10.25881/BPNMSC.2020.91.54.017
17. Malikov M. H., Bokiev F. B. Wound purulent–inflammatory complications after non-protracted hernioplasty. Avicenna Bulletin, 2022, № 24(4), pp. 532–540. (In Russ.) https://doi: 10.25005/2074-0581-2022-24-4-532-540
18. Parshikov V.V. Inflammatory Complications of Prosthetic Plastic Surgery of the Abdominal Wall: Diagnostics, Treatment, and Prevention (Review). Modern Technologies in Medicine, 2019, № 3(11), pp. 158–178. (In Russ.)
19. Stoyko Yu.M., Levchuk A.L. Application of the Local Negative Pressure Method in the Complex Treatment of Patients with Wound Infection. Bulletin of Surgut State University. Medicine, 2021, № 2 (48). (In Russ.) https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/primenenie-metoda-lokalnogo-otritsatelnogo-davleniya-v-kompleksnom-lechenii-patsientov-s-ranevoy-infektsiey
20. Fedushkin V.V., Baryshev A.G. Vacuum therapy in the treatment of wounds of various etiologies: a systematic review. Kuban Scientific Medical Bulletin, 2021, № 28 (6), pp. 117–132. (In Russ.) https://doi: 10.25207/1608-8102-2021-28-6-117-13221
21. Ahmed M., Mehboob M. Сomparisons of onlay versus sublay mesh fixation technique in ventral abdominal wall incisional hernia repair. Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons-Pakistan, 2019, № 29(9), pp. 819–822. https://doi: 10.29271/jcpsp.2019.09.819
22. Alkhatib H., Tastaldi L., et al. Impact of modifiable comorbidities on 30–day wound morbidity after open incisional hernia repair. Surgery, 2019, № 166 (1), pp. 94–101. https://doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2019.03.011
23. Dipp Ramos R., O’Brien W. J., et al. Incidence and risk factors for long–term mesh explantation due to infection in more than 100,000 hernia operation patients. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 2021, № 232 (6), pp. 872–880. https://doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.12.064
24. Falagas M.E. et al. Mesh–related infections after hernia repair surgery. Clinical Microbiology and Infection, 2005, № 11 (1), pp. 3–8.
25. Howard R., Thompson M., et al. Costs associated with modifiable risk factors in ventral and incisional hernia repair. JAMA network open, 2019, № 2 (11). https://doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.16330
26. Jacombs A.S.W., Karatassas A. et al. Biofilms and effective porosity of hernia mesh: are they silent assassins? Hernia, 2020, № 24 (1), pp. 197–204. https://doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-02063-y
27. Kallick E., Nistico L., et al. Resistance of synthetic and biologic surgical meshes to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus biofilm: an in vitro investigation. International Journal of Biomaterials, 2019. https://doi: 10.1155/2019/1063643
28. Kanitra J.J., Hess A.L. et al. Hernia recurrence and infection rate in elective complex abdominal wall repair using biologic mesh. BMC Surgery, 2019, № 19 (1), pp. 174. https://doi: 10.1186/s12893-019-0640-3
29. Kao A.M., Arnold M.R. et al. Comparison of Outcomes After Partial Versus Complete Mesh Excision. Annals of Surgery, 2020, № 272(1), pp. 177–182.
30. Luo Y., Yang Q., et al. Mechanisms and control strategies of antibiotic resistance in pathological biofilms. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2021, № 31(1), pp. 1–7. https://doi: 10.4014/jmb.2010.10021
Review
For citations:
Kislyakov V.A., Misharina L.K., Gorshunova E.M., Shiboldenkova K.A., Otman H. Using local negative pressure to preserve the mesh prosthesis in late purulent – necrotic complications of hernioplasty. Moscow Surgical Journal. 2025;(4):195-201. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17238/2072-3180-2025-4-195-201
Views:
107
JATS XML
Email this article 