Preview

Moscow Surgical Journal

Advanced search

Resistant ascites in liver cirrhosis: a comparative analysis of pathogenetically based treatment approaches

https://doi.org/10.17238/2072-3180-2025-4-70-78

Abstract

Introduction. Ascites significantly impacts the prognosis of liver cirrhosis (LC). Current treatment methods are effective but have side effects. A comparative evaluation of these approaches will help personalize treatment strategies and improve outcomes in LC patients.
Objective. To compare the efficacy and safety of pathogenetically justified treatments for refractory ascites in patients with liver cirrhosis.
Materials and Methods. The study, conducted at the Botkin Hospital, Moscow, included 92 patients with LC and ascites, divided into three treatment protocols: Group 1 (n=35) received diuretic therapy, Group 2 (n=31) underwent transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS), and Group 3 (n=26) received combination therapy with Terlipressin 1000 mcg/day plus Furosemide 40–200 mg/day. The groups were comparable in sex and age; the mean MELD score was 13±2,6 in Group 1, 14,13±3,51 in Group 2, and 15,15±3.4 in Group 3. Monitoring was performed at baseline, after 14 days, 30 days, and then every 2 months for one year. Compensation criteria included no progression of ascites or signs of liver decompensation. One-year mortality was assessed.
Results. In Group 1, the compensation period lasted 31,2±10,31 weeks with a mortality rate of 26 % (9 patients). Group 2 showed a significantly longer compensation duration of 41,5±13,17 weeks compared to Group 1 (p<0,05), though hepatic encephalopathy worsened in 17 patients (54,8 %) within one month, with a mortality rate of 10 % (3 cases). In Group 3, the compensation period was 37,4±11,4 weeks, also significantly longer than in Group 1 (p=0,012), with an 11 % mortality rate (3 cases). These findings demonstrate that pathogenetically targeted treatments for ascites significantly prolong the compensation period in patients with liver cirrhosis.

About the Authors

A. V. Shabunin
Botkin Hospital; Russian Medical Academy continuous professional education
Russian Federation

Shabunin Alexey Vasilyevich – Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Director; Head of the Department of Surgery 

125284, Moscow, 2nd Botkinsky ave., 5, building 1.



Ch. S. Pavlov
Botkin Hospital; I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University
Russian Federation

Pavlov Chavdar Savov – Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Head of the Department of IPO Therapy; a leading researcher 

8 Trubetskaya str., building 2, Moscow, 119048



O. N. Levina
Botkin Hospital
Russian Federation

Levina Oksana Nikolaevna – Candidate of Medical Sciences, Senior Researcher, Head of the Department of Hepatopancreatogastroenterology 

125284, Moscow, 2nd Botkinsky ave., 5, building 1.



P. A. Drozdov
Botkin Hospital; Russian Medical Academy continuous professional education
Russian Federation

Drozdov Pavel Alekseevich – MD, Senior Researcher, Deputy Director 

125284, Moscow, 2nd Botkinsky ave., 5, building 1.



S. V. Osipova
Botkin Hospital
Russian Federation

Osipova Svetlana Vladimirovna – Researcher, Gastroenterologist, Department of Hepatopancreatogastroenterology 

125284, Moscow, 2nd Botkinsky ave., 5, building 1.



A. V. Arablinsky
Botkin Hospital
Russian Federation

Arablinsky Alexander Vladimirovich – Senior Researcher, Head of the Department of X-ray Surgical Methods of Diagnosis and Treatment 

125284, Russia, Moscow, 2nd Botkinsky ave., 5, building 1.



D. V. Matveev
Russian Medical Academy continuous professional education
Russian Federation

Matveev Dmitry Vladimirovich – MD, Professor, Department of Surgery, Transplantology and Applied Oncology 

125993, Moscow, Barrikadnaya str., 2/1, building 1



A. Yu. Lukin
Botkin Hospital; Russian Medical Academy continuous professional education
Russian Federation

Lukin Andrey Yuryevich – Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Deputy Chief Physician 

125284, Moscow, 2nd Botkinsky ave., 5, building 1



E. A. Lidzhieva
Russian Medical Academy continuous professional education
Russian Federation

Lidzhieva Elsa Anatolyevna – a surgeon at the Department of Transplantology 

125284, Moscow, 2nd Botkinsky ave., 5, building 1.



References

1. Agrawal R., Majeed M., Attar B.M., Omar Y.A., Chimezi M., Patel P. et al. Reexamining the data used in the 2012 guidelines of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases for the management of adult patients with ascites due to cirrhosis. Ann Gastroenterol, 2019, № 32(6), рр. 642–649. https://doi.org/10.20524/aog.2019.0415

2. European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of patients with decompensated cirrhosis. J Hepatol., 2018, № 69(2), рр. 406–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2018.03.024

3. Cirrhosis of the liver (in adults): clinical recommendations. Approved by the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 2023. https://cr.minzdrav.gov.ru/recomend/123 (in Russ.)

4. Bai Z., Méndez-Sánchez N., Romeiro F.G., Mancuso A., Philips CA., Tacke F. et al. Use of albumin infusion for cirrhosis-related complications: an international position statement. JHEP Rep., 2023, № 5(8), рр. 100785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhepr.2023.100785

5. Benmassaoud A., Freeman S.C., Roccarina D., Plaz Torres M.C., Sutton A.J., Cooper N.J. et al. Treatment for ascites in adults with decompensated liver cirrhosis: a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev., 2020, № 1, рр. CD013123. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858

6. Musso C.G., Juárez R., Glassock R.J. Water, electrolyte, acid-base, and trace elements alterations in cirrhotic patients. Int Urol Nephrol., 2018, № 50(1), рр. 81–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-017-1614-y

7. Fukui H. Do vasopressin V2 receptor antagonists benefit cirrhotics with refractory ascites? World J Gastroenterol., 2015, № 21(41), рр. 11584–1196. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i41.11584

8. Yang J.X., Peng Y.M., Zeng H.T., Lin X.M., Xu Z.L. Drainage of ascites in cirrhosis. World J Hepatol., 2024, № 16(9), рр. 1245–1257. https://doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v16.i9.1245

9. Brown M.A., Gueyikian S., Huffman S., Donahue L. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt reduction techniques. Semin Intervent Radiol., 2023, № 40(1), рр. 27–32. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1764286

10. Henriksen J.H., Møller S. Alterations of hepatic and splanchnic microvascular exchange in cirrhosis: local factors in the formation of ascites. In: Rodes J, editor. Textbook of hepatology., 3rd ed. Oxford: Blackwell, 2005, рp. 19–34.

11. Zaccherini G., Tufoni M., Bernardi M. Albumin administration is efficacious in the management of patients with cirrhosis: a systematic review of the literature. Hepat Med., 2020, № 12, рр. 153–172. https://doi.org/10.2147/HMER.S264231

12. Rajesh S., George T., Philips C.A., Ahamed R., Kumbar S., Mohan N. et al. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in cirrhosis: an exhaustive critical update. World J Gastroenterol., 2020, № 26(37), рр. 5561–5596. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v26.i37.5561

13. Garbuzenko D.V. The main stages of optimization of the technique of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic bypass surgery as a method of treating complications of portal hypertension. Annals of surgical hepatology, 2024, № 29(3), pp.116–123. https://doi.org/10.16931/1/1995-5464.2024-3-116-123 (in Russ.)

14. Podymova S.D. New approaches to pathogenesis, clinical presentation and treatment of hepatic encephalopathy. Terapevticheskii Arkhiv [Therapeutic archive, 2021, № 93(2), рр. 236–242. https://doi.org/10.26442/00403660.2021.02.200613 (in Russ.)

15. Will V., Rodrigues S.G., Berzigotti A. Current treatment options of refractory ascites in liver cirrhosis - a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Liver Dis., 2022, № 54(8), рр. 1007–1014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2021.12.007

16. Kim S.K., Belikoff B.G., Guevara C.J., Park S.J. An algorithm for management after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt placement according to clinical manifestations. Dig Dis Sci., 2017, № 62(2), рр. 305–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-016-4399-4

17. Pimanov S.I., Makarenko E.V. Treatment of decompensated cirrhosis of the liver. Part II. Hepatorenal syndrome. Gastroenterology. Surgery. Intensive care. Consilium Medicum, 2019, № 1, рр. 36–41. https://doi.org/10.26442/26583739.2019.1.190312 (in Russ.)

18. Gowda M., Dilipbhai D.M., Jalihal U., Kumar M.P., Gowda S.B., Jain A. et al. Efficacy and safety of terlipressin infusion in hepatorenal syndrome-acute kidney injury (HRS-AKI): a retrospective observational study. Cureus, 2024, № 16(8), рр. e66581. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.66581

19. Sanyal A.J., Boyer T.D., Garcia-Tsao G., Regenstein F., Rossaro L., Appenrodt B. et al. A randomized, prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of terlipressin for type 1 hepatorenal syndrome. Gastroenterology, 2008, № 134(5), рр. 1360–1368. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2008.02.014

20. Gluud L.L., Christensen K., Christensen E., Krag A. Systematic review of randomized trials on vasoconstrictor drugs for hepatorenal syndrome. Hepatology, 2010, № 51(2), рр. 576–584. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.23286


Review

For citations:


Shabunin A.V., Pavlov Ch.S., Levina O.N., Drozdov P.A., Osipova S.V., Arablinsky A.V., Matveev D.V., Lukin A.Yu., Lidzhieva E.A. Resistant ascites in liver cirrhosis: a comparative analysis of pathogenetically based treatment approaches. Moscow Surgical Journal. 2025;(4):70-78. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17238/2072-3180-2025-4-70-78

Views: 127

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2072-3180 (Print)