Preview

Moscow Surgical Journal

Advanced search

Comparison of endovideosurgical intraperitoneal (IPOM plus) and extraperitoneal retromuscular (eTEP RS) hernioplasties for midline incisional ventral hernias — intermediate results of a randomized controlled trial

https://doi.org/10.17238/2072-3180-2024-4-41-50

Abstract

Introduction. Treatment of patients with postoperative ventral hernias is an urgent problem in general surgical practice. According to clinical recommendations, there is no single “gold standard” for the treatment of patients with midline incisional ventral hernias.

Purpose of the study. To compare the results of treatment of patients with midline incisional ventral hernias using IPOM plus and eTEP RS.

Materials and methods of the Study. A prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT) was initiated on the basis of N.I. Pirogov State Clinical Hospital No.1. Inclusion criteria: patients of both sexes from 18 years old, presence of midline postoperative hernia, width of hernia defect from 2 to 6 cm inclusive, ASA I-II. The study was performed according to the protocol published on ClinicalTrials.gov after obtaining approval from the hospital ethical committee. The study protocol initially outlined an interim analysis of outcomes after achieving greater than 50 % patient enrollment.

Treatment outcomes. Between February 2023 and April 2024, 45 patients were enrolled in the study: eTEP RS (n=23), IPOM plus (n=22). Pain syndrome at 6 h, 24 h, at discharge and at 7 days was significantly less severe in the eTEP RS group compared to the IPOM plus group (p= 0,0001; p= 0,003; p=˂0,0001, p= 0,0003). Chronic pain syndrome was more frequent in the IPOM plus group n=6 (28,6 %), versus 3 (12,5 %) in the eTEP RS group. Wound complications were more prevalent in the IPOM plus group (7 (31,8 %), p= 0,03), due to the number of seromas.

Conclusion. The interim results show a lower incidence of pain in the postoperative period and a lower incidence of chronic pain syndrome with the eTEP-RS technique.

About the Authors

A. V. Sazhin
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University; GBUZ State clinic hospital № 1 named after N.I. Pirogov DZM
Russian Federation

Sazhin Alexander Vyacheslavovich – Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Corresponding Member, Head of the Department of Faculty Surgery № 1 of the Institute of Surgery, Moscow, Ostrovityanova str. 1, 117513;

Moscow, 117049, Leninsky pr, 10, Bldg. 5



G. B. Ivakhov
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University; GBUZ State clinic hospital № 1 named after N.I. Pirogov DZM
Russian Federation

Ivakhov Georgiy Bogdanovich – Doctor of Medical Sciences, Associate Professor, Professor of the Department of Faculty Surgery № 1 of the Institute of Surgery, Moscow, 1, Ostrovityanova St., 117513;

Moscow, 117049, Leninsky pr., 10, corp.5



D. Kuzmauskas
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University; GBUZ State clinic hospital № 1 named after N.I. Pirogov DZM
Russian Federation

Kuzmauskas Deividas – postgraduate student of the Department of Faculty Surgery № 1, Institute of Surgery, Moscow, 117049;

surgeon, off-budget surgical department, Leninsky pr. 10, bldg.5, Moscow 119049



A. V. Andriyashkin
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University; GBUZ State clinic hospital № 1 named after N.I. Pirogov DZM
Russian Federation

Andriyashkin Andrey Vyacheslavovich – PhD, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Faculty Surgery № 1 of the Institute of Surgery, Moscow, Ostrovityanova St., 1, 117513;

Moscow, 119049, Leninsky pr., 10, bldg. 5



S. M. Titkova
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
Russian Federation

Titkova Svetlana Mikhailovna – Senior Researcher, Department of Experimental Surgery, Institute of Surgery,

117049, Moscow



M. V. Anurov
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
Russian Federation

Anurov Mikhail Vladimirovich – Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Head of Department, Department of Experimental Surgery, Institute of Surgery,

117049, Moscow



T. V. Nechay
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University; GBUZ State clinic hospital № 1 named after N.I. Pirogov DZM
Russian Federation

Nechay Taras Vyacheslavovich – Doctor of Medical Sciences, Associate Professor, Professor of the Department of Faculty Surgery № 1 of the Institute of Surgery, Moscow, 1,  Ostrovityanova St., 117513,

Moscow, 119049, Leninsky pr., 10, corp.5



E. S. An
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University; GBUZ State clinic hospital № 1 named after N.I. Pirogov DZM
Russian Federation

An Evgeny Sankhovich – PhD, Associate Professor of the Department of Faculty Surgery № 1 of the Institute of Surgery, Deputy Chief Physician for Surgical Care, 1 Ostrovityanova St., 117513;

Moscow 119049, Leninsky pr., 10, corp.5



V. A. Mamadumarov
GBUZ State clinic hospital № 1 named after N.I. Pirogov DZM
Russian Federation

Mamadumarov Vokhidjon Akhmadjanovich – Head of Surgical Department № 1,

Moscow, 119049



K. M. Loban
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University; GBUZ State clinic hospital № 1 named after N.I. Pirogov DZM
Russian Federation

Loban Konstantin Mikhailovich – PhD, Assistant of the Department of Faculty Surgery № 1 of the Institute of Surgery, Moscow, 1 Ostrovityanova St., 117513;

Moscow, 119049, Leninsky pr., 10, bldg. 5, Leninsky pr. 5



A. A. Kalinina
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University; GBUZ State clinic hospital № 1 named after N.I. Pirogov DZM
Russian Federation

Kalinina Alexandra Alexandrovna – Specialist in educational and methodical work of UCIMT MSC of the Institute of Anatomy and Morphology named after N.I. Pirogov DZM, Moscow, Russia. Academician Y.M. Lopukhin, surgeon, off-budget surgical department, 1, Ostrovityanova St., Moscow, Russia, 117513;

Leninsky pr., 10, bldg. 5, Moscow



M. D. Indrukh
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
Russian Federation

Indrukh Margarita Denisovna – clinical resident of the Department of Faculty Surgery № 1 of the Institute of Surgery,

Moscow, 1, Ostrovityanova St., 117513



A. V. Konovalenko
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
Russian Federation

Konovalenko Artur Vadimovich – Clinical Resident, Department of Faculty Surgery № 1, Institute of Surgery,

Moscow, 1, Ostrovityanova St., 117513



References

1. Harji D., Thomas C., Antoniou S.A., Chandraratan H., Griffiths B., Henniford B.T., Horgan L., Köckerling F., López-Cano M., Massey L., Miserez M., Montgomery A., Muysoms F., Poulose B.K., Reinpold W., Smart N.; NoSTRA HarMoNY. A systematic review of outcome reporting in incisional hernia surgery. BJS Open., 2021, Mar; 5; № 5(2), рр. zrab006. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrab006

2. Van Ramshorst G.H., Eker H.H., Hop W.C., Jeekel J., Lange J.F. Impact of incisional hernia on health-related quality of life and body image: a prospective cohort study. Am J Surg., 2012, Aug; № 204(2), рр. 144–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.01.012

3. Jargon D., Friebe V., Hopt U.T., Obermaier R. Risikoprofil und Rezidivprophylaxe der Narbenhernie — was ist evidenzbasiert? [Risk factors and prevention of incisional hernia — what is evidence-based?]. Zentralbl Chir., 2008, Sep; № 133(5), рр. 453–457. German. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1076961

4. Reistrup H., Zetner D.B., Andresen K., Rosenberg J. [Prevention of incisional hernia]. Ugeskr Laeger., 2018, Aug 20; № 180(34), рр. V02180094. Danish. PMID: 30152315.

5. Sanders D.L., Pawlak M.M., Simons M.P., Aufenacker T., Balla A., Berger C., Berrevoet F., de Beaux A.C., East B., Henriksen N.A., Klugar M., Langaufová A., Miserez M., Morales-Conde S., Montgomery A., Pettersson P.K., Reinpold W., Renard Y., Slezáková S., Whitehead-Clarke T., Stabilini C. Midline incisional hernia guidelines: the European Hernia Society. Br J Surg., 2023, Nov 9; № 110(12), рр. 1732–1768. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znad284

6. Clinical recommendations — Postoperative ventral hernia — 2021- 2022-2023 (10/23/2021) — Approved by the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation. (In Russ.)

7. Bittner R. et al., Laparoscopic Hernia Repair Techniques: IPOM and Beyond. Annals of Surgery, 2019.

8. Belyansky I., Daes J., Radu V.G., Balasubramanian R., Reza Zahiri H., Weltz A.S., Sibia U.S., Park A., Novitsky Y. A novel approach using the enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) technique for laparoscopic retromuscular hernia repair. Surg Endosc., 2018, Mar; № 32(3), рр. 1525- 1532. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5840-2

9. Li J., Wang Y., Wu L. The Comparison of eTEP and IPOM in Ventral and Incisional Hernia Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech., 2022, Jan 17; № 32(2), рр. 252–258. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000001035

10. Jain M., Krishna A., Prakash O., Kumar S., Sagar R., Ramachandran R., Bansal V.K. Comparison of extended totally extra peritoneal (eTEP) vs intra peritoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) repair for management of primary and incisional hernia in terms of early outcomes and cost effectiveness-a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc., 2022, Oct; № 36(10), рр. 7494–7502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09180-3

11. Dindo D., Demaro nes N., Clavien P.A. Classifi cao on of surgical complicaƟ ons: a new proposal with evaluaƟ on in a cohort of 6336 paƟ ents and results of a survey. Annals of Surgery, 2004, № 240, рр. 205–213. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae

12. Alekseeva N.V., Byvaltsev V.A., Belykh E.G., Sorokovikov V.A. The use of scales and questionnaires in the examination of patients with degenerative lesion of the lumbar spine: methodological recommendations. Irkutsk: Federal State Budgetary Institution «NCRVH» SB RAMS, 2013, 32 p. (In Russ.)

13. Li J., Wang Y., Wu L. The Comparison of eTEP and IPOM in Ventral and Incisional Hernia Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech., 2022, Jan 17; № 32(2), рр. 252–258. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000001035

14. Jain M., Krishna A., Prakash O., Kumar S., Sagar R., Ramachandran R., Bansal V.K. Comparison of extended totally extra peritoneal (eTEP) vs intra peritoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) repair for management of primary and incisional hernia in terms of early outcomes and cost effectiveness-a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc., 2022, Oct; № 36(10), рр. 7494–7502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09180-3

15. Shakhramanyan I.I. et al. Chronic pain after hernioplasty: comparison of IPO and eTEP techniques. Surgical Journal, 2021. (In Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Sazhin A.V., Ivakhov G.B., Kuzmauskas D., Andriyashkin A.V., Titkova S.M., Anurov M.V., Nechay T.V., An E.S., Mamadumarov V.A., Loban K.M., Kalinina A.A., Indrukh M.D., Konovalenko A.V. Comparison of endovideosurgical intraperitoneal (IPOM plus) and extraperitoneal retromuscular (eTEP RS) hernioplasties for midline incisional ventral hernias — intermediate results of a randomized controlled trial. Moscow Surgical Journal. 2024;(4):41-50. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17238/2072-3180-2024-4-41-50

Views: 257


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2072-3180 (Print)