Endoscopically assisted puncture gastrostomy in adults and children. Clinic experience
https://doi.org/10.17238/2072-3180-2022-4-31-40
Abstract
Introducion. Oral intake of nutrients is physiological. However, some patients cannot eat per os. In this regard, there is a need to find alternative options for the introduction of nutrition. In the presence of indications for long-term enteral nutrition, gastrostomy is most preferable.
The purpose of this paper is to show the experience of gastrostomy in adults and children in our clinic, as well as the relative simplicity and advantages of using endoscopically assisted gastrostomy with an assessment of the indications and possible complications.
Materials and methods of research. From July 2019 to October 2022, 50 endoscopically assisted puncture gastrostomies were performed at Ilyinskaya Hospital JSC, five of them in children.
Treatment results. In 97% of patients, gastrostomy tubes in the postoperative period retained their tightness, no obstruction of the canal was observed in 100% of cases. Minor complications were recorded in 8% of cases; large – 6%.
Conclusion. It is necessary to give preference to endoscopically assisted puncture gastrostomy by the Push method using low-profile balloon gastrostomy tubes, which is due to low invasiveness, safety, short duration of intervention and relative ease of its implementation.
About the Authors
M. I. VyborniyRussian Federation
Vyborniy Mikhail Igorevich – Candidate of Medical Sciences,
Deputy Chief Physician for Surgery, Head of the Department of
Minimally Invasive Surgery and Endoscopy
143421, 2 build. 2 Rublevskoe predmestie st., vil. Glukhovo, Krasnogorsk district, Moscow region
A. Yu. Pakhomova
Russian Federation
Pakhomova Anastasiya Yurievna – Endoscopist, Department of
Minimally Invasive Surgery and Endoscopy
143421, 2 build. 2 Rublevskoe predmestie st., vil. Glukhovo, Krasnogorsk district, Moscow region
D. V. Kulikov
Russian Federation
Kulikov Denis Valentinovich – Head of the Department of Pediatric Surgery
143421, 2 build. 2 Rublevskoe predmestie st., vil. Glukhovo, Krasnogorsk district, Moscow region
N. F. Shchapov
Russian Federation
Shchapov Nikolay Fedorovich – Candidate of Medical Sciences,
Leading surgeon of the Department of Pediatric Surgery
143421, 2 build. 2 Rublevskoe predmestie st., vil. Glukhovo, Krasnogorsk district, Moscow region
I. S. Sadikov
Russian Federation
Sadikov Igor Sergeevich – Endoscopist, Department of Minimally
Invasive Surgery and Endoscopy
143421, 2 build. 2 Rublevskoe predmestie st., vil. Glukhovo, Krasnogorsk district, Moscow region
References
1. Kurien M., Penny H. and Sanders D.S. Impact of direct drug delivery via gastric access devices. Expert opinion on drug delivery, 2015, Vol. 12, № 3, pp. 455–463. https://doi.org/10.1517/17425247.2015.966683
2. Welbank T. and Kurien M. To PEG or not to PEG that is the question. The Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 2021, Vol. 80, № 1, pp. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002966512000703X
3. Arvanitakis M., Gkolfakis P., Despott E. J., Ballarin A., Beyna T., Boeykens K., Elbe P., Gisbertz I., Hoyois A., Mosteanu O., Sanders D.S., Schmidt P.T., Schneider S.M. and van Hooft J.E. Endoscopic management of enteral tubes in adult patients - Part 1: Definitions and indications. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy, 2021, Vol. 53, № 1, pp. 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1303-7449
4. Buchman A.L., Moukarzel A.A., Bhuta S., Belle M., Ament M.E., Eckhert C.D., Hollander D., Gornbein J., Kopple J.D. and Vijayaroghavan S.R. Parenteral nutrition is associated with intestinal morphologic and functional changes in humans. JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition, 1995, Vol. 19, № 6, pp. 453–460. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148607195019006453
5. Braunschweig C.L., Levy P., Sheean P. M. and Wang X. Enteral compared with parenteral nutrition: a meta-analysis. The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2001, Vol. 74, № 4, pp. 534–542. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/74.4.534
6. Pironi L., Boeykens K., Bozzetti F., Joly F., Klek S., Lal S., Lichota M., Mühlebach S., Van Gossum A., Wanten G., Wheatley C. and Bischoff S.C. ESPEN guideline on home parenteral nutrition. Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland), 2020, Vol. 39, № 6, pp. 1645–1666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2020.03.005
7. Chow R., Bruera E., Chiu L., Chow S., Chiu N., Lam H., McDonald R., DeAngelis C., Vuong S., Ganesh V. and Chow E. Enteral and parenteral nutrition in cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Annals of palliative medicine, 2016, Vol. 5, № 1, pp. 30–41. https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2224-5820.2016.01.01
8. Fugazza A., Capogreco A., Cappello A., Nicoletti R., Da Rio L., Galtieri P.A., Maselli R., Carrara S., Pellegatta G., Spadaccini M., Vespa E., Colombo M., Khalaf K., Repici A. and Anderloni A. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and jejunostomy: Indications and techniques. World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2022, Vol. 14, № 5, pp. 250–266. https://doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v14.i5.250
9. McClave S.A., DiBaise J.K., Mullin G.E. and Martindale R.G. ACG Clinical Guideline: Nutrition Therapy in the Adult Hospitalized Patient. The American journal of gastroenterology, 2016, Vol. 111, № 3, pp. 315–335. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2016.28
10. Heaney A. and Tham T.C. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomies: attitudes of general practitioners and how management may be improved. The British journal of general practice: the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2001, Vol. 51, № 463, pp. 128–129. PMID: 11217626
11. Abuksis G., Mor M., Plaut S., Fraser G. and Niv Y. Outcome of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG): comparison of two policies in a 4-year experience. Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland), 2004, Vol. 23, № 3, pp. 341–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2003.08.001
12. Gauderer M.W., Ponsky J. L. and Izant R. J., Jr. Gastrostomy without laparotomy: a percutaneous endoscopic technique. Journal of pediatric surgery, 1980, Vol. 15, № 6, pp. 872–875. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3468(80)80296-x
13. Yuan Y., Zhao Y., Xie T. and Hu Y. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy versus percutaneous radiological gastrostomy for swallowing disturbances. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2016, Vol. 2, № 2, CD009198. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009198.pub2
14. Backman T., Arnbjörnsson E., Berglund Y. and Larsson L.T. Videoassisted gastrostomy in infants less than 1 year. Pediatric surgery international, 2006, Vol. 22, № 3, pp. 243–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-005-1628-x
15. Retes F.A., Kawaguti F.S., de Lima M.S., da Costa Martins B., Uemura R.S., de Paulo G.A., Pennacchi C.M., Gusmon C., Ribeiro A.V., Baba E.R., Geiger S.N., Sorbello M.P., Kulcsar M.A., Ribeiro U., Jr. and Maluf-Filho F. Comparison of the pull and introducer percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy techniques in patients with head and neck cancer. United European gastroenterology journal, 2017, Vol. 5, № 3, pp. 365–373. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050640616662160
16. Fortunato J.E., Troy A.L., Cuffari C., Davis J.E., Loza M.J., Oliva-Hemker M. and Schwarz K.B. Outcome after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in children and young adults. Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition, 2010, Vol. 50, № 4, pp. 390–393. https://doi.org/10.1097/MPG.0b013e3181aed6f1
17. Bondarenko S.B., Kotlovsky A.M., Sharoev T.A. and Ivanova N.M. The use of puncture gastrostomy among children. Russian journal of pediatric surgery, anesthesia and intensive care, 2015, Vol. 5, № 1, pp. 93–97 (In Russ.)
18. Di Leo G., Pascolo P., Hamadeh K., Trombetta A., Ghirardo S., Schleef J., Barbi E. and Codrich D. Gastrostomy Placement and Management in Children: A Single-Center Experience. Nutrients, 2019, Vol. 11, № 7, p. 1555. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11071555
Review
For citations:
Vyborniy M.I., Pakhomova A.Yu., Kulikov D.V., Shchapov N.F., Sadikov I.S. Endoscopically assisted puncture gastrostomy in adults and children. Clinic experience. Moscow Surgical Journal. 2022;(4):31-40. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17238/2072-3180-2022-4-31-40