Preview

Moscow Surgical Journal

Advanced search

Long-term results of the frozen elephant trunk procedure: 10-year experience of a single center

https://doi.org/10.17238/2072-3180-2025-3-56-67

Abstract

Background. The frozen elephant trunk (FET) procedure is a widely used method for treating extensive thoracic aortic diseases. Despite its significant advantages, a high risk of distal aortic complications requiring reintervention remains.
Objectives. To evaluate outcomes of the FET procedure, the frequency and nature of reinterventions, and risk factors associated with reoperations.
Materials and methods. We performed a retrospective single-center observational study of 347 patients who underwent FET from 2014 to 2025. Various hybrid prostheses were used, including the Russian dissection-specific stent-graft “Soft Elephant Trunk.” Survival and risk factor analyses were performed using Kaplan–Meier and multivariate logistic regression.
Results. The mean patient age was 52,8±11,5 years, with 71 % male. Ten-year survival was 78 %. Reinterventions were required in 13,5 % of patients, including 11,2 % distal and 1,7 % proximal reinterventions. The main cause of unplanned reinterventions (n=19, 5,5 %) was negative remodeling, which in 58 % of cases of new distal stent graft-induced new entry (dSINE), whereas staged reinterventions were performed in 20 cases (5,7 %). Open surgical reinterventions were associated with higher 7-year survival (90 %) compared to endovascular treatments (60 %). Connective tissue disorder was an independent predictor of reintervention risk (HR 4,11, p=0,002).
Conclusions. The FET procedure remains the gold standard for treating extensive thoracic aortic disease, ensuring high long-term survival. Our study showed that open surgery after FET provides better long-term results compared to endovascular interventions. Connective tissue disorders require dynamic CT follow-up. Optimization of surgical strategy, and active postoperative monitoring remain key factors in successful treatment and prevention of complications.

About the Authors

E. R. Charchyan
Petrovsky National Research Centre of Surgery
Russian Federation

Charchyan Eduard Rafaelovich – Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Doctor of Medical Sciences, Head of the Department of Reconstructive Cardiovascular Surgery

119991, Moscow, GSP-1, Abrikosovsky per., 2



D. G. Breshenkov
Petrovsky National Research Centre of Surgery
Russian Federation

Breshenkov Denis Gennadevich – Candidate of Medical Sciences, Senior Researcher, Cardiovascular Surgeon, Department of Reconstructive Cardiovascular Surgery

119991, Moscow, GSP-1, Abrikosovsky per., 2, Phone: +7 (977) 343-90-41 



D. A. Chakal
Petrovsky National Research Centre of Surgery
Russian Federation

Chakal Deyyara Alievna – Candidate of Medical Sciences, Researcher, Department of Reconstructive Cardiovascular Surgery

119991, Moscow, GSP-1, Abrikosovsky per., 2



A. P. Gens
Petrovsky National Research Centre of Surgery
Russian Federation

Gens Andrey Pavlovich – Doctor of Medical Sciences, Leading Researcher, Professor of the Department of Reconstructive Cardiovascular Surgery

119991, Moscow, GSP-1, Abrikosovsky per., 2



A. B. Stepanenko
Petrovsky National Research Centre of Surgery
Russian Federation

Stepanenko Anna Borisovna – Doctor of Medical Sciences, Chief Researcher, Professor, Department of Reconstructive Cardiovascular Surgery

119991, Moscow, GSP-1, Abrikosovsky per., 2



S. A. Abugov
Petrovsky National Research Centre of Surgery
Russian Federation

Abugov Sergey Alexandrovich – Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS), Professor, Doctor of Medical Sciences, Head of the Department of Endovascular Diagnostics and Treatment

119991, Moscow, GSP-1, Abrikosovsky per., 2



Yu. V. Belov
Petrovsky National Research Centre of Surgery
Russian Federation

Belov Yuriy Vladimirovich – Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Director, Institute of Cardio-Aortic Surgery

119991, Moscow, GSP-1, Abrikosovsky per., 2



References

1. Kato M., Ohnishi K., Kaneko M., Ueda T., Kishi D., Mizushima T., et al. New graft-implanting method for thoracic aortic aneurysm or dissection with a stented graft. Circulation, 1996, № 94 (9 Suppl), pp. 188–193.

2. Charchyan E., Breshenkov D., Belov Y. Follow-up outcomes after the frozen elephant trunk technique in chronic type B dissection. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg., 2020, № 57(5), pp. 904–911. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezz348

3. Kozlov B. N., Panfilov D. S., Saushkin V. V., Nasrashvili G. G., Kuznetsov M.S., Nenakhova A.A., et al. Distal aortic remodelling after the standard and the elongated frozen elephant trunk procedure. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg., 2019, № 29(1), pp. 117–123. https://doi.org/10.1093/ICVTS/IVZ026

4. Kozlov B. N., Panfilov D. S., Khodashinskiy I. A. Five-year results of using the ‘frozen elephant trunk’ technique for thoracic aortic dissection. Angiology and Vascular Surgery, 2019, № 25(2), pp. 65–71. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33529/angio2019205

5. Kozlov B. N., Panfilov D. S., Kim E. B. Long-term outcomes of frozen elephant trunk for aortic dissection: a single-center experience. J Cardiothorac Surg., 2024, № 19(1), pp. 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/S13019-024-03074-2/FIGURES/3

6. Kozlov B. N., Panfilov D. S. False lumen thrombosis after frozen elephant trunk procedure in acute and chronic aortic dissection. J Cardiovasc Surg., 2022, № 63(2), pp. 195–201. https://doi.org/10.23736/S0021-9509.21.11800-2

7. Kozlov B., Panfilov D., Lukinov V. Frozen Elephant Trunk for Aortic Dissection Using Different Hybrid Grafts: Preliminary Results from a Prospective Study. J Pers Med., 2023, № 13(5), p. 784. https://doi.org/10.3390/JPM13050784

8. Chernyavsky A. M., Lyashenko M. M., Syrota D. A., Khvan D. S., Kozlov B. N., Panfilov D. S., Lukinov V. L. Hybrid technology in the surgical treatment of proximal aortic dissection. Russian Journal of Cardiology, 2018, № 23(11), pp. 8–13. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2018-11-8-13

9. Kozlov B. N., Panfilov D. S., Gutor S. S., Sharysh D. V., Shukhodolo I. V., Zherbakhanov A. V., Sonduev E. L., Shipulin V. M. Morphological state of the aortic wall in ascending aortic aneurysm. Clinical and Experimental Surgery, 2018, № 6(4), pp. 43–48. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24411/2308-1198-2018-14006

10. Kreibich M., Berger T., Rylski B., Chen Z., Beyersdorf F., Siepe M., et al. Aortic reinterventions after the frozen elephant trunk procedure. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg., 2020, № 159(2), pp. 392–399.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.02.069

11. Kreibich M., Berger T., Rylski B. The frozen elephant trunk: a onestage, two-stage or even three-stage treatment? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg., 2021, № 60(2), pp. 352–353. https://doi.org/10.1093/EJCTS/EZAB129

12. Nakhaei P., Bashir M., Jubouri M., Banar S., Ilkhani S., Borzeshi E.Z., и др. Aortic remodeling, distal stent-graft induced new entry and endoleak following frozen elephant trunk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Card Surg., 2022, № 37(11), pp. 3848–3862. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocs.16918

13. Belov Yu. V., Charchyan E. R., Breshenkov D. G., et al. Surgical treatment of mega aorta syndrome: a single-center experience. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery, 2021, № (6–2), pp. 15–25. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia202106215

14. Panfilov D. S., et al. Frozen elephant trunk technique with different proximal landing zone for aortic dissection. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2021, № 33(2), pp. 286–292. https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivab086

15. Kozlov B. N., Panfilov D. S., Manvelyan D. V., Sonduev E. L., Zatolokin V. V., Petlin K. A. The first results of surgical reconstruction of the aorta using the domestic aortic hybrid stent-graft MedEng. The Siberian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, 2021, № 36(1), pp. 102–107. https://doi.org/10.29001/2073-8552-2021-36-1-101-107


Review

For citations:


Charchyan E.R., Breshenkov D.G., Chakal D.A., Gens A.P., Stepanenko A.B., Abugov S.A., Belov Yu.V. Long-term results of the frozen elephant trunk procedure: 10-year experience of a single center. Moscow Surgical Journal. 2025;(3):56-67. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17238/2072-3180-2025-3-56-67

Views: 13


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2072-3180 (Print)