Modern views on the pathogenesis and treatment of alkaline reflux gastritis developing after gastric resection. (literature review)
https://doi.org/10.17238/2072-3180-2023-2-123-97
Abstract
Introduction. Among patients with complicated ulcers, in 25–50% of cases there are chronic duodenal obstruction (CDO), on the other hand, the resection of the stomach itself is the cause of the disruption of the normal function of the duodenal sphincter. Data on the frequency of duodenogastric reflux in peptic ulcer and after gastric resections are very contradictory.
Purpose – to present modern views on the pathogenesis and treatment of alkaline reflux gastritis that develops after gastric resection.
Material and methods. Literature search was carried out in the following electronic databases: Paragraph Medicine, Web of Knowledge (ThomsonReuters), Scopus, Pubmed Medline, The Сocrane Library, Springer Link, Ebscohost Science Direct. The search period was from 2003 to 2020 (with the exception of 5 sources:). More than 250 sources have been analyzed. The review includes 40 articles on the specified topic, which were available in full text and analyzed by critical evaluation.
Results. Summarizing the literature review, we can say that there are no significant reductions in the number of post-gastroresection complications, including duodeno-gastric reflux (DGR). One of the methods for the prevention of DGR is the detection of CDO in the preoperative period. The only variant of gastroenteroanastomosis that can prevent enterogastric bile reflux is a Roux-loop anastomosis.
Conclusions. These patients should be operated on in clinics where surgeons are impeccably proficient in various types of operations on the esophagus, stomach and duodenum. Literature data suggest that in the majority of patients with excessive enterogastric reflux, transformation into a long loop of Roux-en-Y leads to a stable symptomatic effect for at least 3 years.
About the Authors
G. B. Isaev
Scientific Center of Surgery named after Academician M. A. Topchibashev
Azerbaijan
Azerbaijan
Guidayat Bilal Isaev oglu, Doctor of Medical Sciences, Prof., Chief Researcher
Department of Abdominal Surgery
AZ1122
Bakikhanov str., 23
Baku
Yu. D. Aliyev
Azerbaijan Medical University
Azerbaijan
Azerbaijan
Yusif Damed Aliyev oglu, MD, Professor
Department of Surgery
AZ1022
Bakikhanov str., 23
Baku
R. E. Jafarli
Scientific Center of Surgery named after Academician M. A. Topchibashev; Azerbaijan Medical University
Azerbaijan
Azerbaijan
Rasim Elkhan Jafarli oglu, MD, Associate Professor
Department of Surgery
AZ1122
AZ1022
Bakikhanov str., 23
Baku
T. N. Abbaszade
Scientific Center of Surgery named after Academician M. A. Topchibashev
Azerbaijan
Azerbaijan
Tural Nadir Abaszade oglu, Candidate of Medical Sciences, Researcher
Department of Abdominal Surgery
AZ1122
Bakikhanov str., 23
Baku
Z. S. Efеndiyev
Azerbaijan Medical University; LOSEF-Losante Childiren and ADULT Hospital
Azerbaijan
Azerbaijan
Zahid Samir Eftndiev oglu,
AZ1022
23 Nisan Cd. № 20, 06830 Gölbaşı
Baku
Turkey
Ankara
References
1. Shirinskaya N. V. Peptic ulcer of the stomach and duodenum in the Russian Federation. Morbidity and mortality. Public health and health care, 2016, pp. 105–109. (In Russ.)
2. Zemlyanoy V. P., Sigua B. V., Danilov A. M., Kotkov P. A. Historical milestones in the development of peptic ulcer surgery (to the 135<sup>th</sup> anniversary of the first successful resection of the stomach, proposed by T. Billroth). Bulletin of Surgery named after I. I. Grekov, 2016, № 175 (6), рр. 91–94. (In Russ.)
3. Kavitt R. T., Lipowska A. M., Anyane-Yeboa A., Gralnek I. M. Diagnosis and Treatment of Peptic Ulcer Disease. Am J Med., 2019, Apr; № 132 (4), рр. 447–456. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2018.12.009 Epub 2019 Jan 3. PMID: 30611829.
4. Coco D., Leanza S. A Review on Treatment of Perforated Peptic Ulcer by Minimally Invasive Techniques. Maedica (Bucur), 2022, Sep; № 17 (3), рр. 692–698. URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9720636/ PMID: 36540584; PMCID: PMC9720636.
5. Minushkin O. N., Zverkov I. V., Skibina Yu. S. Some approaches to the treatment of patients with chronic (biliary) reflux gastritis. Medical Alphabet, 2017, № 19, № 2. pp. 28–31. (In Russ.)
6. Shi X., Chen Z., Yang Y., Yan S. Bile Reflux Gastritis: Insights into Pathogenesis, Relevant Factors, Carcinomatous Risk, Diagnosis, and Management. Gastroenterol Res Pract., 2022, Sep; № 12, рр. 2022: 2642551. doi: 10.1155/2022/2642551 PMID: 36134174; PMCID: PMC9484982
7. Studenikin L. V. Chronic disorders of duodenal patency: a modern view of the problem. Perm Medical Journal, 2017, Vol. XXXIV, № 6, рр. 101–109. (In Russ.)
8. Chernousov A. F., Khorobrykh T. V., Bogopolsky P. M. Surgery of gastric ulcer and duodenal ulcer. Practical Medicine, 2016, № 351. (In Russ.).
9. Mariyko V. A., Romanova N. N., Kremyansky M. A., Tretyakov V. O., Mariyko A. V. Current state of elective surgery for peptic ulcer. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery, 2019, № 4, рр. 24–29. (In Russ.) doi: 10.17116/hirurgia201904124
10. Evseev M. A., Distal resection of the stomach in emergency surgery of gastroduodenal ulcers. М. :2008, 160 р. (In Russ.)
11. Nasirov M. Ia, Abdieva G. Kh. The surgical treatment of chronic duodenal obstruction in patients with duodenal and gastric ulcer. Georgian Med News, 2009, Apr; № 169, рр. 18–20. PMID: 19430035.
12. Davis J. L., Ripley R. T. Postgastrectomy Syndromes and Nutritional Considerations Following Gastric Surgery. Surg Clin North Am., 2017, Apr; № 97 (2), рр. 277–293. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2016.11.005 PMID: 28325187.
13. Mukoyama T., Kanaji S., Sawada R., Harada H., Urakawa N., Goto H., Hasegawa H., Yamashita K., Matsuda T., Oshikiri T., Kakeji Y. Assessment of risk factors for delayed gastric emptying after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Sci Rep., 2022, Sep 23; № 12 (1), рр. 15903. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-20151-5 PMID: 36151365; PMCID: PMC9508160
14. Babak O. Ya. Bile reflux: modern views on pathogenesis and treatment. Modern gastroenterology, 2003, № 1 (11), рр. 28–30. (In Russ.)
15. Chen T. F., P. K. Yadav, Wu R. J. et al. Comparative evaluation of intragastric bile acids and hepatobiliary scintigraphy in the diagnosis of duodenogastric reflux. World J. Gastroenterol., 2013, vol. 19, № 14, рр. 2187–2196.
16. Galiev Sh. Z., Amirov N. B. Duodenogastric reflux as a cause of reflux gastritis. Bulletin of modern clinical medicine, 2015, v. 8, рр. 50–61. (In Russ.)
17. Hudnall A., Bardes J. M., Coleman K., Stout C., Regier D., Balise S., Borgstrom D., Grabo D. The surgical management of complicated peptic ulcer disease: An EAST video presentation. J Trauma Acute Care Surg., 2022, Jul 1, 93 (1), рр. e12–e16. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003636 Epub 2022 Apr 1. PMID: 35358158; PMCID: PMC9233136.
18. Fedorov I. V. Late complications of gastric surgery. Moscow surgical journal, 2015, № 3, рр. 27–32. (In Russ.)
19. Krivigina E. V., Zhigaev G. F. Postgastroresection syndrome. Bulletin of the East Siberian Scientific Center of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2011, № 54, рр. 59–60. (In Russ.)
20. Lapina T. L., Kartavenko I. M., Ivashkin V. T. Pathogenetic and therapeutic significance of bile acids in reflux gastritis. RZHGGK, 2015, № 1, рр. 86–93. (In Russ.)
21. Ritchie W. P. Jr. Alkaline reflux gastritis. Late results on a controlled trial of diagnosis and treatment. Ann Surg., 1986, May; № 203 (5), рр. 537–44. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198605000-00014 PMID: 3707233; PMCID: PMC1251165.).
22. Ersan Y., Karatas A., Carkman S., Cicek Y., Ergüney S. Late results of patients undergoing remedial operations for alkaline reflux gastritis syndrome. Acta Chir Belg., 2009, May-Jun; № 109 (3), рр. 364–370. doi: 10.1080/00015458.2009.11680440, PMID: 19943594.
23. Nazarenko P. M., Bilichenko V. B., Nazarenko D. P., Samgina T. A. The state of duodenal patency in patients with postgastroresection syndromes. Surgery. Journal named after N. I. Pirogov, 2014, № 6, pp. 43–47. (In Russ.)
24. Martynov V. L., Orlinskaya N. Yu., Kolchin D. G., Kurilov V. A., Kazantsev I. B. Prevention of reflux disease after operations on the organs of the gastrointestinal tract. Bulletin of Siberian Medicine, 2015 No. 4 (1). pp. 40-50. doi: 10.20538/1682-0363-2015-1-40-50 (in Russ.)
25. Vassilakis J. S., Xynos E., Zoras O. J., Pechlivanidis G., Fountos A. Surgical treatment of the enterogastric reflux syndrome: preoperative and postoperative estimation by 99mTc-HIDA scintigraphy. Am Surg., 1992, Dec; № 58 (12), рр. 787–791. PMID: 1456610.
26. Dutra R. A., Araújo W. M., Andrade J. I. The effects of Roux-en-Y limb length on gastric emptying and enterogastric reflux in rats. Acta Cir Bras., 2008, Mar-Apr; № 23 (2), рр. 179–283. doi: 10.1590/s0102-86502008000200011 PMID: 18372964
27. Xynos E., Vassilakis J. S., Fountos A., Pechlivanides G., Karkavitsas N. Enterogastric reflux after various types of antiulcer gastric surgery: quantitation by 99mTc-HIDA scintigraphy. Gastroenterology, 1991, Oct; № 101 (4), рр. 991–998. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(91)90725-z PMID: 1889723.
28. Ritchie W. P. Jr. Alkaline reflux gastritis. Gastroenterol Clin North Am., 1994, Jun; № 23 (2), рр. 281–294. PMID: 8070913.
29. Csendes A., Burgos A. M., Smok G., Burdiles P., Braghetto I., Díaz J. C. Latest results (12–21 years) of a prospective randomized study comparing Billroth II and Roux-en-Y anastomosis after a partial gastrectomy plus vagotomy in patients with duodenal ulcers. Ann Surg., 2009, Feb; № 249 (2), рр. 189–194. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181921aa1 PMID: 19212169.
30. Rieu P. M., Joosten H. J., Jansen J. B., Lamers C. B. A comparative study of gastrectomy without vagotomy with either Roux-en-Y or Billroth II anastomosis in peptic ulcer. Hepatogastroenterology, 1994, Jun; № 41 (3), рр. 294–297. PMID: 7959558.
31. Suzuki M., Yokobori T., Ogata K., Nakazawa N., Kimura A., Kogure N., Mochiki E., Kuwano H. Migrating contractions of the afferent and Roux limbs show peristaltic movement independently of each other in conscious dogs after Roux-en-Y reconstruction after distal gastrectomy. Surg Today., 2021, Mar; № 51 (3), рр. 391–396. doi: 10.1007/s00595-020-02139-8 Epub 2020 Sep 14. PMID: 32926235
32. Ye X. S., Lin X., Liu J. J., Shi Y., Qian F., Yu P. W., Zhao Y. L. Comparison of clinical efficacy and quality of life between uncut Roux-en-Y and Billroth II with Braun anastomosis in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi., 2022, Feb 25; № 25 (2), 166–172. Chinese. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20210702-00257 PMID: 35176829
33. Chen S., Chen D. W., Chen X. J., Lin Y. J., Xiang J., Peng J. S. Post-operative complications and nutritional status between uncut Roux-en-Y anastomosis and Billroth II anastomosis after D2 distal gastrectomy: a study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Trials., 2019, Jul 12; № 20 (1), рр. 428. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3531-0 PMID: 31300019; PMCID: PMC6626339.
34. Volkov V. S. Kolesnikova I. Yu. Duodenogastric reflux and duodenal ulcer – dot the «I». Verkhnevolzhsky Medical Journal, 2010, Vol. 8, № 1, pp. 26–29. (In Russ.)
35. Nunobe S., Sasako M., Saka M., Fukagawa T., Katai H., Sano T. Symptom evaluation of long-term postoperative outcomes after pylorus-preserving gastrectomy for early gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer, 2007, № 10 (3), рр. 167–172. doi: 10.1007/s10120-007-0434-7 Epub 2007 Sep 26. PMID: 17922094.
36. Krylov N. N., Mohammed M. Kh. Is there an optimal option for gastroenteroanastomosis after distal subtotal resection of the stomach? Surgery. Journal them. N.I. Pirogova, 2012, № 8, рр. 83–86. (In Russ.)
37. Chi F., Lan Y., Bi T., Zhou S. Billroth-II with Braun versus Roux-en-Y reconstruction in totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne, 2021, Dec; № 16 (4), рр. 664–668. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2021.103965 Epub 2021 Feb 26. PMID: 34950260; PMCID: PMC8669982.
38. Ye X. S. Lin X., Liu J. J., Shi Y., Qian F., Yu P. W., Zhao Y. L. Comparison of clinical efficacy and quality of life between uncut Roux-en-Y and Billroth II with Braun anastomosis in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi, 2022, Feb 25; № 25 (2), рр. 166–172. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20210702-00257 PMID: 35176829.
39. Gibadullin N. V., Trunov S. N., Pugachev M. A. Improvement of methods of prevention of duodenogastric reflux. Russian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Coloproctology, 2008, v. 18, № 1 (Appendix № 31), pр. 71. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Isaev G.B., Aliyev Yu.D., Jafarli R.E., Abbaszade T.N., Efеndiyev Z.S. Modern views on the pathogenesis and treatment of alkaline reflux gastritis developing after gastric resection. (literature review). Moscow Surgical Journal. 2023;(2):123-132. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17238/2072-3180-2023-2-123-97
Views:
346
Email this article 