ACUTE CHOLECYSTITIS: QUO VADIS? EXPERIENCE OF 13,000 OPERATIONS IN ONE CLINIC
https://doi.org/10.17238/issn2072-3180.2021.2.18-25
Abstract
Relevance. Surgical treatment of acute cholecystitis (AC) remains one of the most urgent problems of emergency surgery. AC is the most frequent complication of gallstone disease, reaching 30% or more in the structure of this disease. Despite the widespread introduction of modern endoscopic surgical techniques, there are still many unresolved problems in the treatment of AC.
Material and methods. This paper summarizes the experience of treating more than 13,000 patients with GBD who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Acute cholecystitis occurred in 3140 patients. The author adheres to active surgical tactics — laparoscopic surgery in the first 2‒16 hours from admission in the absence of absolute contraindications to the pneumoperitoneum.
Results. The paper discusses the technical features of laparoscopic operations in various forms of AC, discusses the reasons for unsatisfactory results of surgical treatment of AC, such as late hospitalization and the use of ineffective conservative therapy, delaying the recovery of patients. The negative consequences of multi-stage AC treatment methods are discussed, and an algorithm for early radical surgical intervention is defined. The nature of inflammatory changes in the GB wall and nearby space tissues, as well as the presence of adhesions in the abdominal cavity, did not affect the decision on the timing of the operation and the choice of method.
About the Author
O. E. Lutsevich
Department of faculty surgery № 1 Moscow state medical and dental University named after A.I. Evdokimov
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Oleg E. Lutsevich - Doсt. of Sсi. (Med.), Professor, Corresponding Member of the Russiаn Асаdemy of Sсienсes, head, chief surgeon of CELT (Russia, Moscow)
20/1, Delegatskaya str., Moscow, 127473
References
1. Beburishvili A. G., Panin S. I., Zyubina E. N., Bykov A.V. Miniinvazivnye vmeshatel’stva pri ostrom holecistite: sostoyanie problemy po dannym dokazatel’noj mediciny [Minimally invasive interventions in acute cholecystitis: the state of the problem according to evidence-based medicine]. Annals of Surgical Hepatology, 2011, Vol, 16, No. 2, pp. 83–88. (In Russ.)
2. Briskin B. S., Lomidze O. V. Sovremennye podhody k hirurgicheskomu lecheniyu ostrogo holecistita. XI Mezhdunarodnaya konferenciya hirurgov-gepatologov Rossii i stran SNG [Modern approaches to surgical treatment of acute cholecystitis. XI International Conference of Surgeons- Hepatologists of Russia and the CIS countries]. Ann. Hir. Hepat., 2004, No. 9: 2, p. 113. (In Russ.)
3. Korolev B. A., Pikovsky D. L. Ekstrennaya hirurgiya zhelchnyh putej [Emergency surgery of the biliary tract]. M.: Meditsina, 1990, 240 p. (In Russ.)
4. Lutsevich O. E., Amirkhanov A. A., Urbanovich A. S. K voprosu o taktike hirurgicheskogo lecheniya bol’nyh pozhilogo i starcheskogo vozrasta s destruktivnym holecistitom. Tezisy dokladov XVII s”ezda Rossijskogo Obshchestva Endoskopicheskih Hirurgov [On the tactics of surgical treatment of elderly and senile patients with destructive cholecystitis. Abstracts of the reports of the XVII Congress of the Russian Society of Endoscopic Surgeons]. Endoscopic Surgery, 2014, No. 1, Appendix, pp. 236–237. (In Russ.)
5. Revishvili A.Sh., Fedorov A.V., Sazhin V.P., Olovyannyi V.E. [Emergency surgery in Russian Federation] Khirurgiya. Zhurnal im. N.I. Pirogova, 2018, No. 11, рр. 39–43. https://doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia201903188 Sostoyanie ekstrennoj hirurgicheskoj pomoshchi v Rossijskoj Federacii (In Russ.)
6. Sovtsov S. A., Prilepina E. V. Holecistit u bol’nyh vysokogo riska [Cholecystitis in high-risk patients]. Surgery. Journal named after N. I. Pirogov, 2013, No. 12, pp. 18–23. (in Russ.)
7. Sovtsov S. A., Prilepina E. V. Vozmozhnosti uluchsheniya rezul’tatov lecheniya ostrogo holecistita [Possibilities of improving the results of treatment of acute cholecystitis]. Surgery. Journal named after N.I. Pirogov, 2015, No. 2, pp. 50–55. (In Russ.)
8. Cherepanin A. I., Lutsevich O. E., Gallyamov E. A., Povetkin A. P. Ostryj holecistit [Acute cholecystitis]. Moscow: Geotar-media, 2016, 221 p. (In Russ.)
9. Barak O., Elazary R., Appelbaum L., Rivkind A., Almogy G. Conservative treatment for acute cholecystitis: clinical and radiographic predictors of failure. Isr Med Assoc J., 2009, 11(12), рр. 739–743.
10. Catena F., Ansaloni L., Bianchi E., Di Saverio S., Coccolini F., Vallicelli C., et al. The ACTIVE (Acute Cholecystitis Trial Invasive Versus Endoscopic) study. Multicenter randomized, doubleblind, controlled trial of laparoscopic (LC) versus open (OC) surgery for acyte cholecystitis (AC). Hepatogastroenterology, 2013, 60(127), рр. 1552–1556.
11. Elshaer M., Gravante G., Thomas K., Sorge R., Al-Hamali S., Ebdewi H. Subtotal Cholecystectomy for «Difficult Gallbladders» Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Surg., 2015, 150(2), рр. 159–168.
12. Everhart J.E., Khare M., Hill M., Maurer K.R. Prevalence and ethnic differences in gallbladder disease in the United States. Gastroenterology, 1999, 117(3), р. 632.
13. Gurusamy K.S., Davidson C., Gluud C., Davidson B.R. Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for people with acute cholecystitis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2013, 6, Art, №: CD005440.
14. Karamanos E., Sivrikoz E., Beale E., Chan L., Inaba K., Demetriades D. Effect of diabetes on outcomes in patients undergoing emergent cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. World J Surg., 2013, 37, рр. 2257–2264.
15. Melloul E., Denys A., Demartines N., Calmes J.M., Schäfer M. Percutaneous drainage versus emergency cholecystectomy for the treatment of acute cholecystitis in critically ill patients: does it matter? World J. Surg., 2011, 35(4), рр. 826–833.
16. Papi C., Catarci M., D’Ambrosio L., Gili L., Koch M., Grassi G.B. et al. Timing of cholecystectomy for acute calculous cholecystitis: a metaanalysis. Am. J. Gastroenterol., 2004, 99, рр. 147–155.
17. Shaffer EA. Epidemiology and risk factors for gallstone disease: has the paradigm changed in the 21st century? Curr. Gastroenterol. Rep., 2005, 7, рр. 132–140.
18. Yi N-J, Han H-S, Min S-K. The safety of a laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis in high-risk patients older than sixty with stratification based on ASA score. Minim Invasive Ther. Allied Technol., 2006, 15, рр. 159–164.
19. Pisano M., Allievi N., Gurusamy K. et al. World Society of Emergency Surgery updated guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute calculus cholecystitis. World J. Emerg. Surg., 2020, 15, р. 61. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-020-00336-x
Review
For citations:
Lutsevich O.E. ACUTE CHOLECYSTITIS: QUO VADIS? EXPERIENCE OF 13,000 OPERATIONS IN ONE CLINIC. Moscow Surgical Journal. 2021;(2):18-25. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17238/issn2072-3180.2021.2.18-25
Views:
577
Email this article 