Preview

Moscow Surgical Journal

Advanced search

ОСОБЕННОСТИ И ОТДАЛЕННЫЕ РЕЗУЛЬТАТЫ ПРИМЕНЕНИЯ САМОФИКСИРУЮЩИХСЯ ИМПЛАНТОВ В ЛЕЧЕНИИ БОЛЬНЫХ С ПАХОВЫМИ ГРЫЖАМИ

Abstract

This is prospective research of results inguinal canal repair with self-griping mesh ParieteneTM ProGripTM. Proved that the intensity and duration of pain in early postoperative period, local tissue reactions and ultrasound picture of the wound process is not different from the observations of the use the lightweight composite polypropylene mesh. The main differences in outcomes registered in late postoperative period. They were characterized by low rates of incidence of persistent pain and numbness, the degree limitation of physical activity, an early normalization indicators of physical and mental health components.Key words: inguinal hernia; hernia repair; mesh; chronic pain; quality of life.

About the Authors

S. V. Kharitonov
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University. Russian Federation
Russian Federation


G. V. Rodoman
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University. Russian Federation
Russian Federation


S. S. Kharitonov
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University. Russian Federation
Russian Federation


M. V. Zinyakova
City Clinical Hospital №13, Moscow Department of Public Health. Russian Federation
Russian Federation


References

1. Awad SS, Yallampalli S, Srour AM, et al. Improved outcomes with the Prolene Hernia System mesh compared with the time-honored Lichtenstein onlay mesh repair for inguinal hernia repair. Am. J. Surg. 2007;194(2):274.

2. Beltrán MA, Cruces KS. Outcomes of Lichtenstein hernioplasty for primary and recurrent inguinal hernia. World J. Surg. 2006;30(12);2281-2287.

3. Droeser RA, Dell-Kuster S, Kurmann A, et al. Long-term follow- up of a randomized controlled trial of Lichtenstein's operation versus mesh plug repair for inguinal hernia. Ann. Surg. 2014;259(5):966-972.

4. Fortelny RH, Petter-Puchner AH, Redl H, et al. Assessment of Pain and Quality of Life in Lichtenstein Hernia Repair Using a New Monofilament PTFE Mesh: Comparison of Suture vs. Fibrin-Sealant Mesh Fixation. Front. Surg. 2014;28(1);45.

5. Hallén M, Sevonius D, Westerdahl J, et al. Risk factors for reoperation due to chronic groin postherniorrhaphy pain. Hernia. 2015;19(6);863-869.

6. Magnusson J, Nygren J, Thorell A. Lichtenstein, prolene hernia system, and Ultrapro Hernia System for primary inguinal hernia repair: one-year outcome of a prospective randomized controlled trial. Hernia. 2012;16(3):277-285.

7. Nikkolo C, Lepner U. Chronic pain after open inguinal hernia repair. Postgrad. Med. 2016;128(1):69-75.

8. Nordin P, Bartelmess P, Jansson C, et al. Randomized trial of Lichtenstein versus Shouldice hernia repair in general surgical practice. Br. J. Surg. 2002;89(1):45-49.

9. Porrero JL, Cano-Valderrama O, Castillo MJ, Alonso MT. Proposed technique for inguinal hernia repair with self-gripping mesh: avoiding fixation to undesired structures. Hernia. 2015;19(5);771-774.

10. Ramshaw B, Abiad F, Voeller G, et al. Polyester (Parietex) mesh for total extraperitoneal laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: initial experience in the United States. Surg. Endosc. 2003;17(3):498-501.

11. Sanders DL, Nienhuijs S, Ziprin P, et al. Randomized clinical trial comparing self-gripping mesh with suture fixation of lightweight polypropylene mesh in open inguinal hernia repair. Br. J. Surg. 2014;101(11):1373-1382.

12. Awad SS, Yallampalli S, Srour AM, et al. Improved outcomes with the Prolene Hernia System mesh compared with the time-honored Lichtenstein onlay mesh repair for inguinal hernia repair. Am. J. Surg. 2007;194(2):274.

13. Beltrán MA, Cruces KS. Outcomes of Lichtenstein hernioplasty for primary and recurrent inguinal hernia. World J. Surg. 2006;30(12);2281-2287.

14. Droeser RA, Dell-Kuster S, Kurmann A, et al. Long-term follow- up of a randomized controlled trial of Lichtenstein's operation versus mesh plug repair for inguinal hernia. Ann. Surg. 2014;259(5):966-972.

15. Fortelny RH, Petter-Puchner AH, Redl H, et al. Assessment of Pain and Quality of Life in Lichtenstein Hernia Repair Using a New Monofilament PTFE Mesh: Comparison of Suture vs. Fibrin-Sealant Mesh Fixation. Front. Surg. 2014;28(1);45.

16. Hallén M, Sevonius D, Westerdahl J, et al. Risk factors for reoperation due to chronic groin postherniorrhaphy pain. Hernia. 2015;19(6);863-869.

17. Magnusson J, Nygren J, Thorell A. Lichtenstein, prolene hernia system, and Ultrapro Hernia System for primary inguinal hernia repair: one-year outcome of a prospective randomized controlled trial. Hernia. 2012;16(3):277-285.

18. Nikkolo C, Lepner U. Chronic pain after open inguinal hernia repair. Postgrad. Med. 2016;128(1):69-75.

19. Nordin P, Bartelmess P, Jansson C, et al. Randomized trial of Lichtenstein versus Shouldice hernia repair in general surgical practice. Br. J. Surg. 2002;89(1):45-49.

20. Porrero JL, Cano-Valderrama O, Castillo MJ, Alonso MT. Proposed technique for inguinal hernia repair with self-gripping mesh: avoiding fixation to undesired structures. Hernia. 2015;19(5);771-774.

21. Ramshaw B, Abiad F, Voeller G, et al. Polyester (Parietex) mesh for total extraperitoneal laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: initial experience in the United States. Surg. Endosc. 2003;17(3):498-501.

22. Sanders DL, Nienhuijs S, Ziprin P, et al. Randomized clinical trial comparing self-gripping mesh with suture fixation of lightweight polypropylene mesh in open inguinal hernia repair. Br. J. Surg. 2014;101(11):1373-1382.


Review

For citations:


Kharitonov S.V., Rodoman G.V., Kharitonov S.S., Zinyakova M.V. . Moscow Surgical Journal. 2017;(1):10-15. (In Russ.)

Views: 328


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2072-3180 (Print)