TENSIONED HERNIOPLASTY AND ABDOMINOPLASTY IN PATIENTS WITH MORBIDE OBESITY
https://doi.org/10.17238/issn2072-3180.2020.2.45-53
Abstract
Surgical treatment of hernias of the anterior abdominal wall remains an urgent problem, since hernia-bearing occurs in 4-7% of the world’s population and there is no tendency to reduce the number of such patients.
The aim of the study is to conduct a comparative analysis of traditional and non-tight methods of hernioplasty with hernias of the anterior abdominal wall, improve hernioplasty methods, the frequency of relapses and complications in the near and long-term postoperative periods.
The problem associated with overweight has existed for a very long time, but nevertheless, advances in the treatment of obesity are very small and the number of patients with morbid obesity is growing. According to the WHO, over 30% of the world’s population suffers from overweight. All factors causing excess body weight lead to a weakening of the muscular aponeurotic framework with subsequent formation of abdominal ptosis. For plastic surgery of the anterior abdominal wall in modern surgery in patients with morbid obesity, non-tensioning methods are more preferable, since according to the studies of many authors with stretch hernioplasty, the recurrence rate reaches 20-63%, while in non-tension plastic surgery it is 8-30.3%.
The aim of the study is to improve the quality of life and the results of surgical treatment of patients with morbid obesity.
The material of this study was 62 patients with morbid obesity who were hospitalized in the period from 2010 to 2019 in the surgical department No. 2 of the Republican Clinical Hospital in Nalchik on the basis of Hospital Surgery of KBSU. In our work, all patients had ptosis of the anterior abdominal wall of III (n = 44) and IV (n = 18) degrees of obesity. The patient underwent surgery to eliminate the skin-fat apron and non-tension abdominoplasty using a polypropylene mesh, in the presence of cholelithiasis, a cholecystectomy was performed.
As the results of the study showed, in 38.5% of patients there were some complications of an inflammatory nature, with somewhat more complications such as seromas, lymphorrhea and, as a result, purulent-inflammatory complications. This is due to the fact that patients underwent abdominoplasty in which a wide mobilization of the subcutaneous fat layer is performed and, accordingly, the risk of developing seromas and lymphorrhea is increased. Patients were hospitalized from 16 to 28 days.All patients were discharged in satisfactory condition with recommendations. In terms of the functional effect, due to the optimal scheme of preoperative preparation and abdominoplasty, an improvement in external respiration was noted, and there were no complications from the cardiovascular system. All patients were satisfied with the obtained aesthetic result.
About the Authors
A. D. AslanovRussian Federation
Head of the Department of Hospital Surgery at KBSU, Professor, Doctor of Medical Sciences. General surgeon, cardiovascular surgeon
Nalchik, st. Nogmova 91
O. E. Logvina
Russian Federation
General surgeon, cardiovascular surgeon. Associate Professor of the Department of Hospital Surgery, KBSU. Candidate of Medical Sciences
Nalchik, st. Nogmova 91. Russia
R. M. Kalibatov
Russian Federation
Minister of Health of the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic since 2019 General surgeon. Candidate of Medical Sciences
Nalchik
A. Kh. Kugotov
Russian Federation
General surgeon, cardiovascular surgeon. Assistant of the Department of Hospital Surgery, KBSU
Nalchik, st. Nogmova 91. Russia
A. T. Edigov
Russian Federation
General surgeon. Cardiovascular surgeon. Assistant of the Department of Hospital Surgery, KBSU
Nalchik, st. Nogmova 91. Russia
L. Yu. Kardanova
Russian Federation
General surgeon. Post-graduate student of the Department of Hospital Surgery of the Medical Faculty
Nalchik
K. M. Kudusov
Russian Federation
General surgeon. Postgraduate student of the Department of Hospital Surgery of the Medical Faculty
Nalchik
A. A. Shono
Russian Federation
Adnan General surgeon. Postgraduate student of the Department of Hospital Surgery of the Medical Faculty
Nalchik
References
1. Brauman D. Liposuction abdominoplasty: an advanced body contouring technicue. D. Brauman, J. Capocci. Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 2009, Vol. 124. 5, рр. 85 — 95
2. Lazar C.C. Abdominoplasty after major weight loss: improvement of life and psychological status. Lazar C.C., Clerc I., Deneuve S., Auquit — Auckbur I, Millies P.U. Obes. Surg., 2009, Vol. 19. № 8, рр. 170—175.
3. Logan J.M. Plastic surgery: understanding abdominoplasty and liposuction. Logan G.M., Broughton G 2nd. Aorn J, 2008, Vol. 88. № 4, рр. 587—600.
4. R. R. Brink [et al.]. Abdominoplasty with direct resection of deep fat. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 200, Vol. 123, рр. 1597-1603.
5. Miziev I. A. New techniques of abdominoplasty. I. A. Miziev, S. A. Alishanov. Khirurgiia, 2010, Vol. 12, рр. 65-69. (In Russian)
6. Ramirez O. M. Abdominoplasty and abdominal wall rehabilitation: a comprehensive approach O. M. Ramirez . Plastic and reconstructive surgery, 2000, Vol. 105, № 1, рр. 425-435.
7. Krivoshhekov E.P. Hirurgija ventral’nyh gryzh [Ventral hernia surgery]. E.P. Krioshhekov. Samara : SamLjuksPrint, 2014, 152 р. (In Russian)
8. Vorovskij O.O. Vzaimodejstvie implantirovannoj kompozitnoj setki s brjushinoj pri abdominoplastike. Rossijskij mediko-biologicheskij vestnik imeni akademika I.P. Pavlova, 2013, № 3, рр. 118–123. (In Russian)
9. Hope W.W. Atypical hernias: suprapubic, subxiphoid, and flank. W.W. Hope, W.B. Hooks. Surg. Clin. N. Am., 2013, Vol. 93, рр. 1135–1162.
10. B.K. Poulose [et al.]. Epidemiology and cost of ventral hernia repair: making the case for herniaт research [Text]. Hernia, 2012, Vol. 16, рр. 179–183.
11. Grubnik V.V. Sovremennye metody lechenija brjushnyh gryzh [Modern methods of treating abdominal hernias]. K. : Zdorov’e, 2001, 280 р. (In Russian)
12. Long‐term follow‐up of a randomized controlled trial of suture versus mesh repair of incisional hernia. J.W. Burger [et al.]. Ann Surg. 2004. Vol. 240, № 4. рр. 578–583.
13. Shherbatyh A.V., Sokolova S.V., Shevchenko K.V. Sravnenie jeffektivnosti razlichnyh sposobov hirurgicheskogo lechenija posleoperacionnyh ventral’nyh gryzh. Vestnik jeksperimental’noj i klinicheskoj hirurgii. 2012, 5, рр. 80-82. (In Russian)
14. Neljubin P.S. Vybor optimal’nogo metoda protezirujushhej plastiki perednej brjushnoj stenki u bol’nyh s posleoperacionnymi i recidivnymi ventral’nymi gryzhami: Dis. ... kand. med. nauk.[ The choice of the optimal method for prosthetic repair of the anterior abdominal wall in patients with postoperative and recurrent ventral hernias]. M. 2007. (In Russian)
15. Guljaev M.G. Profilaktika i lechenie recidivnyh ventral’nyh gryzh posle autoplasticheskih i protezirujushhih vmeshatel’stv [Prevention and treatment of recurrent ventral hernias after autoplastic and prosthetic interventions]: Dis. ...kand. med. nauk. Samar,. 2015. (In Russian)
16. Ispol’zovanie novyh tehnologij v gerniologii s abdominoplastikoj [The use of new technologies in herniology with abdominoplasty.]. A.D. Aslanov, O.E. Logvina, M.K. Bapinaev, K.I. Hashhozheva, R.M. Kalibatov. Kafedra gospital’noj hirurgii. Medicinskij fakul’tet KBGU, 2007. (In Russian).
17. Hrapach V.V. Osnovy plasticheskoj i rekonstruktivnoj hirurgii. Abdominoplastika. Tom V. Monografija. K.: Askanija, 2011, 136 р. ISBN 978-966-2203-12-7. (In Russian).
18. Magerramov D.M., Medeubekov U.Sh. Hirurgicheskaja korrekcija deformacii perednej brjushnoj stenki. Real’nost’ i perspektivy (obzor literatury) [Surgical correction of anterior abdominal wall deformity. Reality and Perspectives (Literature Review)]. Vestnik hirurgii Kazahstana, 2017, № 1, рр. 48-53
Review
For citations:
Aslanov A.D., Logvina O.E., Kalibatov R.M., Kugotov A.Kh., Edigov A.T., Kardanova L.Yu., Kudusov K.M., Shono A.A. TENSIONED HERNIOPLASTY AND ABDOMINOPLASTY IN PATIENTS WITH MORBIDE OBESITY. Moscow Surgical Journal. 2020;(2):45-53. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17238/issn2072-3180.2020.2.45-53