CHOICE OF ACCESS FOR URGENT AND EMERGENCY OPERATIONS ON THE COLON
https://doi.org/10.17238/issn2072-3180.2020.3.5-11
Abstract
Introduction: the purpose of this work was to study the immediate results of treatment and develop an algorithm for using different access options for urgent colon operations.
Material and methods: the study performed a retrospective analysis of the results of treatment of 89 patients with various diseases of the colon, operated on urgently and urgently. All patients were divided into 2 groups: 31 patients (the main group) - operated from laparoscopic access, 58 patients (the comparison group) - from laparotomic access. The groups were comparable in age, frequency, and type of underlying and concomitant diseases, but differed in gender, risk class of anesthesia (ASA), and incidence of complications of the underlying disease.
Results: the main indications for emergency or urgent surgery were acute intestinal obstruction (16.2% vs. 53.5%), intestinal bleeding (41.9% vs. 6.9%) and peritonitis (22.6% vs. 29.3%). The average duration of operations did not depend on the type of access used. There were no significant differences in the frequency of postoperative complications between patients of both groups (9.7% vs. 6.9%). The use of laparoscopic access resulted in a statistically significant reduction in the recovery time of intestinal peristalsis (2.1±0.4 vs. 3.8±0.9 days), and was accompanied by a significant reduction in the time of use of analgesics (2.7±0.6 vs. 4.6±1.2 days).
Conclusion: the use of laparoscopic approach for urgent diseases of the colon does not increase the duration of interventions and frequency of postoperative complications, but is accompanied by a shortening of postoperative intestinal paresis and reduced need for analgesics. The developed algorithm for selecting surgical access allows increasing the number of patients with urgent colon diseases who can be operated minimally invasive.
About the Authors
B. M. Niyozbekov
RUDN University;
Regional clinical hospital
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Bakhtovar Marambekovich Niyozbekov - PhD student at the Department of hospital surgery with the course of pediatric surgery
117198, 6 Miklukho-Maklaya str., Moscow
F. S. Kurbanov
RUDN University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Fazil Samed Kurbanov - professor at the Department of hospital surgery with the course of pediatric surgery, Doctor of Medicine
117198, 6 Miklukho-Maklaya str., Moscow
M. A. Chinikov
RUDN University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Maxim Alekseevich Chinikov - associate professor at the Department of hospital surgery with the course of pediatric surgery, Doctor of Medicine
117198, 6 MiklukhoMaklaya str., Moscow
R. H. Azimov
Central Clinical Hospital of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Rustam Hasanovich Azimov - head of the surgical Department, PhD in Medical sciences
117593, 1A Litovsky Boulevard, Moscow
T. Z. Rzaev
RUDN University;
Regional clinical hospital
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Tural Ziyally ogly Rzaev - PhD student at the Department of hospital surgery with the course of pediatric surgery
117198, 6 Miklukho-Maklaya str., tural-rzae
Z. B. Khalilov
Central hospital
Azerbaijan
Azerbaijan
Zaur Bahman Khalilov - head of the Department of General surgery, PhD in Medical sciences
AZ1006 76 Parliament Avenue, Baku
References
1. Sheligin Yu.A., Frolov S.A., Achkasov S.I., Sushkov O.I., Shahmatov D.G. Laparoskopicheskie assistirovannye operacii pri rake obodochnoj kishki [The manually assisted laparoscopic surgery of colon cancer]. Hirurgiya. Zhurnal im. N.I. Pirogova, 2012, 8, рр. 34−38. (In Russ.)
2. Glushkov N.I., Gorshenin T.L. Videoassistirovannye operacii v lechenii raka obodochnoj kishki, oslozhnennogo obturacionnoj kishechnoj neprohodimost’yu, u bol’nyh pozhilogo i starcheskogo vozrasta [Video-assisted operations in the treatment of colon cancer complicated by obturation intestinal obstruction in elderly and senile patients]. Kubanskij nauchnyj medicinskij vestnik, 2015, 4 (153), рр. 59−62. (In Russ.)
3. Mozhanov E.V., Karpuhin O.YU., Shakurov A.F., Eleev A.A. Laparoskopicheskij dostup v hirurgicheskom lechenii neopuholevyh zabolevanij tolstoj kishki [Laparoscopic access in the surgical treatment of nontumor diseases of the colon]. Prakticheskaya medicina, 2015, 4 (89), Vol. 1, pp. 147−150. (In Russ.)
4. Abraha I., Binda G.A., Montedori A., Arezzo A., Cirocchi R. Laparoscopic versus open resection for sigmoid diverticulitis. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2017 Nov., 25, 11 (11), CD009277. http://doi:10.1002/14651858.CD009277.pub2.
5. Di Saverio S., Birindelli A., Mandrioli M., Podda M., Binda G.A. Intracorporeal anastomoses in emergency laparoscopic colorectal surgery from a series of 59 cases: where and how to do it − a technical note and video. Colorectal Dis., 2017 Apr., 19 (4), pp. O103−O107. http://doi:10.1111/codi.13642
6. Penna M., Markar S.R., Mackenzie H., Hompes R., Cunningham C. Laparoscopic Lavage Versus Primary Resection for Acute Perforated Diverticulitis: Review and Meta-analysis. Ann. Surg., 2018, Feb., 267 (2), pp. 252−258. http://doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000002236.
7. Strate L.L., Morris A.M. Epidemiology, pathophysiology, and treatment of diverticulitis. Gastroenterology, 2019, Apr., 156 (5), pp. 1282−1298. e1. http://doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2018.12.033
8. Koh F.H., Tan K.K., Tsang C.B., Koh D.C. Laparoscopic Versus an Open Colectomy in an Emergency Setting: A Case-Controlled Study. Ann. Coloproctol., 2013, Feb., 29 (1), pp. 12−16. http://doi:10.3393/ac.2013.29.1.12.
9. Kim I.Y., Kim B.R., Kim Y. W. Outcomes of Laparoscopic and Open Surgery for Colorectal Cancer in the Emergency Setting. Iin vivo, 2015, 29, pp. 295−300. PMID: 25792660.
Review
For citations:
Niyozbekov B.M., Kurbanov F.S., Chinikov M.A., Azimov R.H., Rzaev T.Z., Khalilov Z.B. CHOICE OF ACCESS FOR URGENT AND EMERGENCY OPERATIONS ON THE COLON. Moscow Surgical Journal. 2020;(3):5-11. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17238/issn2072-3180.2020.3.5-11
Views:
523
Email this article 